Justin.tv Sued For Copyright Infringement
"Since its inception, Justin.tv's members and users have employed the website and its technology as a platform to illegally distribute, stream, perform, copy or broadcast UFC live events," the UFC alleges in a complaint filed late last week in U.S. District Court in Nevada.
Companies like Justin.tv typically respond to these types of allegations by arguing that they are protected by the Digital Millennium Copyright Act's safe harbor provisions, which say that Web sites are immune from liability for infringing material uploaded by users as long as the sites remove material upon request.
But UFC alleges that Justin.tv's procedures for responding to takedown notices aren't satisfactory. Although Justin.tv provides an online tool that's supposed to allow UFC to request the takedown of streams as they are occurring, that tool "does not always function correctly," UFC says in its complaint.
UFC, which offers paid broadcasts of wrestling matches, kickboxing competitions and the like, says Justin.tv should do more to prevent pirated material from ever appearing on its site -- including assigning employees to monitor the site and remove unauthorized streams, deploying an "algorithmic solution disabling potential copyright infringement," and using watermark technology to match user uploads against copyrighted material.
Viacom made a similar argument in its lawsuit against YouTube, contending that the video-sharing site should proactively use digital fingerprinting technology to prevent unauthorized clips from appearing. But U.S. District Court Judge Louis Stanton dismissed Viacom 's lawsuit last year, ruling that YouTube met its obligations under the DMCA because it removed user-uploaded clips upon request. Viacom is appealing that decision.
This lawsuit against Justin.tv isn't the first time that UFC has made it known it's unhappy about online copyright infringement. In December of 2009, UFC CEO and Chairman Lorenzo Fertitta testified at a House Judiciary Commitee hearing that Justin.tv and other streaming sites were "making fortunes by aiding in the theft of our content and making it available through their website."
Recent Daily Online Examiner Articles
-
Apple Facing Uphill Battle In Ebook Trial May 24, 5:15 p.m.
Apple is slated to go on trial on June 3 for conspiring to increase the price ...
-
Penguin Shells Out $75 Million To Settle Price-Fixing Charges May 23, 4:45 p.m.
Penguin will pay $75 million to settle claims by a coalition of state attorneys general that ...
-
Airbnb Ruled Illegal In N.Y., User Hit With Four-Figure Fine May 22, 5:18 p.m.
New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg has made no secret of his hope that the city ...
-
AT&T Loosens Video Chat Restrictions May 21, 5:10 p.m.
Changing course, AT&T has decided to allow all users -- including those with unlimited data plans ...
-
Aereokiller Agrees To Change Name May 20, 4:38 p.m.
Aereokiller, embroiled in litigation with the TV networks, is putting at least one legal dispute behind ...
-
Appeals Court Turns Away Twitter's Challenge To Subpoena May 17, 4:55 p.m.
An appellate court in New York has dismissed Twitter's appeal of a ruling requiring it to ...
-
Apple: No 'Direct Evidence' Of Ebook Price-Fixing May 16, 5:10 p.m.
Did Apple conspire with book publishers to end Amazon's $9.99-per-ebook price? That's the question at the ...
-
AT&T Stirs Controversy With Data-Cap Plans May 15, 5 p.m.
AT&T CEO Randall Stephenson reportedly confirmed today that the carrier plans to let content companies pay ...
-
Pandora User Seeks To Revive Privacy Lawsuit May 14, 4:48 p.m.
In 2010, music service Pandora was one of the first companies to partner with Facebook for ...
-
New Bill Legalizes Cell-Phone Unlocking, DVD Ripping May 13, 5:05 p.m.
Consumers could once again have the right to unlock their cell phones, if a new law ...


Be the first to comment on "Justin.tv Sued For Copyright Infringement"
Leave a Comment