With Brand-Builder Olbermann Gone, MSNBC Heads Into Uncertain Territory
Recent ratings data may suggest otherwise, but for much of MSNBC's ascent, the network rode on Olbermann's back to big ratings, notoriety, and, yes, controversy.
Olbermann was obviously outspoken and seemingly always having run-ins with management. This wasn't new. Fox News, ESPN, and CNN reportedly had issues with him as well in his previous assignments.
But you get what you pay for. And Olbermann gave MSNBC a singularly distinct, unapologetic, strong voice for the liberal side of politics. Passion is key among cable news network loyalists on either side of the aisle.
"They have GOT to be kidding! Olbermann IS MSNBC!!!!," wrote one blogger. "This will NOT stand! Keith has MILLIONS of loyal viewers who would not miss a minute of his program. MSNBC is asking for TROUBLE! There will be PROTESTS! There will be a BOYCOTT! This is OUTRAGEOUS!!!!"
It is the kind of TV engagement advertisers want. No doubt, fans of O'Reilly, Beck, and Hannity have similar connections.
But NBC News has something Fox News -- right or wrong -- doesn't have. That's a long straight-ahead, journalism legacy. To many older established NBC reporters/anchors, Olbermann's spiel never jived well with the established network's longtime ways. They continue to see MSNBC as an uneasy success.
If you advertise on MSNBC, you're probably wondering what's next. Olbermann's exit would seem to mean the loss of some existing rating points. And that can't help -- especially as new owner Comcast walks in the door.
The good news is that other MSNBC "personalities" are putting up Olbermann-type numbers. The bad? His over-the-top commentaries, which generated big headlines and PR buzz, will be hard to replace.
0 comments on "With Brand-Builder Olbermann Gone, MSNBC Heads Into Uncertain Territory".
Leave a Comment
Recent TV Watch Articles
-
Does TV Need One Big Show That Pulls In All Viewers? June 17, 4:21 p.m.
More than last season, this was the year Fox’s “American Idol” came down off its high ...
-
Fighting Executives Continue To Rage Against Bigger Media Companies June 14, 5:26 p.m.
It seems that small and mid-size cable network executives will always be at war with powerful ...
-
A Different Sort Of Prediction: More Live Viewing, And Perhaps Less Time-Shifting June 13, 4:59 p.m.
More than other digital platforms, Twitter has been compared to “live” TV -- or real-time media. ...
-
TV In The Clouds: Where's The Sunshine? June 12, 2:50 p.m.
Some executives can see TV’s future perfectly -- through the clouds. That's the point. Content owners ...
-
TV A La Carte -- From The Start June 11, 3:56 p.m.
Perhaps Intel has the right approach to revolutionizing the way we buy our traditional TV service ...
-
Broadcast Upfront So Far: Looking For Even-Steven June 10, 1:36 p.m.
Surviving tough times for many in the broadcast upfront business means maintaining an even keel. So ...
-
Cigarette Ads Back On TV? Not Quite June 7, 3:27 p.m.
Bans on TV advertising for specific products don't slow down technology. TV ads for tobacco-laden cigarettes, ...
-
Sex And Violence Are Still TV Issues -- And So Is Research About Them June 6, 1:38 p.m.
The arguments connecting media violence or suggestive sexual content to real-life actions never seem to end. ...
-
Attacking On-Air Talent With A Commercial Could Mean New Drama For TV News Marketing June 5, 4:52 p.m.
Seems you can't buy a TV commercial on a network that attacks the network. Shocking, huh? ...
-
Stations Branding To Women May Signal The Start Of More Broadcast Narrowcasting June 4, 4:32 p.m.
"Men, shut off your TV." Maybe this could be a new promo for some broadcast stations ...

Wayne Friedman is West Coast Editor of MediaPost.
MSNBC...." a long straight-ahead, journalism legacy." What??? MSNBC has been a shill for the DNC and/or the Democratic President since its inception in 1996. It has steadily moved further left over the years. National journalism, with regard to politics, died a long time ago and MSNBC was among the first bullets that helped kill it.
Comcast Rule is only the beginning. The all commanding and powerful will grow as competition wanes.
I'm a solid fan of Olbermann's work, and have been for a few years. I realize he's far from perfect, and he can sometimes be maddeningly corny and nerdy, but that's part of his charm.
He's also one of, if not the most intelligent political commentators on the scene. And even more importantly, he understands the vital importance of wry humor when he deals with his subject.
Jon Stewart and Stephen Colbert have the slapstick and goofy sides of political humor down cold, but Olbermann is the master of wry when it comes to politics. And that will be sorely missed by those of us who appreciate the value of poking the proverbial stick in the political opponent's eye with witty, intelligent, stinging rebuttal.
What MSNBC, and their parent NBC-Universal, has failed to understand (yet again) is that viewers are loyal to the talent, and not to the network. We don't care what goes on behind the scenes. We only care about what we see on the screen.
Dumping someone because they insulted your choice of necktie at a company cocktail party, or something similar, is a really dumb way to run a network. Then again, NBC has become expert at making poor decisions over the years, and I speak from personal experience.
As tennis commentator Mary Carillo once said; "Never change a winning game, and always change a losing game."
With Olbermann, MSNBC had a winning game, and they blew it. Again.
Tom Fraticelli's comment below deserves a response. he wrote:
"MSNBC....' a long straight-ahead, journalism legacy.' What??? MSNBC has been a shill for the DNC and/or the Democratic President since its inception in 1996. It has steadily moved further left over the years. National journalism, with regard to politics, died a long time ago and MSNBC was among the first bullets that helped kill it."
The key term here is "among the first bullets", since if there wasn't a Fox News, there never would have been an MSNBC, at least in its current format.
I agree that political broadcasting dialogue has changed over the years, but having a choice has always been the goal. Fox News presents the view from the Right, so someone has to present the view from the Left to maintain that choice and balance. That's the value of MSNBC.
And as Fox moves further Right, MSNBC should move further Left. And those of us on either side should never call for the removal of the voice of the other side.
National political journalism is still very much alive. The game is still being played. It's just a different playing field.
As far as the "DNC shill" part goes, you may want to check other MSNBC programs. The Democrats, and President Obama, get hammered regularly, just not unfairly.
Big ratings numbers? Are you kidding? Olbermann got only a fraction of the numbers the lowest Fox shows get. My guess is, like the monumental blowhard he is, he finally got too big for his britches with the people at MSNBC who matter, and they finally realized that he was more trouble than he was worth -- although with his out clause, they'll have to keep paying him for some time.
"With Brand-Builder Olbermann Gone, MSNBC Heads Into Uncertain Territory"
I much preferred the old days when MSNBC was heading into certain territory.