FTC Brings First SMS Spam Case
The commission's complaint, filed Tuesday in U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, alleges that Huntington Beach resident Phillip Flora sent millions of unsolicited text messages to consumers advertising loan modification and debt-relief programs. In one 40-day period starting in August of 2009, Flora allegedly sent 5.5 million such messages.
Flora also allegedly collected and sold the phone numbers of people who responded to the ads, including people who responded for the sole purpose of asking him to stop spamming them. "Many recipients of defendant Flora's text message spam have experienced annoyance, frustration, and a sense of harassment from receiving the spam," the complaint alleges.
Unlike the case with email spam, sending unsolicited SMS ads does not violate the federal CAN-SPAM law. But the FTC alleges that the ads are still unlawful as unfair and deceptive business practices.
The authorities say the ads were deceptive because they directed users to a site with "gov" in the domain name -- loanmod-gov.net -- even though the site had no connection to the government. The FTC also alleges that the ads are unfair to consumers because many recipients were charged for the SMS ads by their wireless carriers.
The FTC is seeking an order directing Flora to stop sending the ads and monetary damages, including restitution to the recipients who were charged for the text messages. FTC attorney Robert G. Schoshinski says industry estimates show that around 12% of all wireless users are charged up to 20 cents per message for incoming texts. "The damages could potentially be very large," he says.
This lawsuit marks the first time the FTC is wading into SMS spam, but not the first time complaints about text messages have landed in court. Consumers themselves have recently begun suing alleged SMS spammers for violating the Telephone Consumer Protection Act. That statute prohibits marketers from using automatic telephone dialing systems to make calls to cell phones unless the owners have consented.
An influential appellate court ruled in 2009 that a consumer could pursue a lawsuit against publisher Simon and Schuster and mobile marketing firm ipsh! for allegedly sending unsolicited SMS ads promoting Stephen King's "Cell."
0 comments on "FTC Brings First SMS Spam Case".
Leave a Comment
Recent Online Media Daily Articles
-
Path Seeks Dismissal Of Wireless-Spam Case May 23, 5:07 p.m.
Mobile social network Path is asking a federal judge to dismiss a lawsuit alleging that the ... -
Amazon Appstore Goes Global May 23, 4:59 p.m.
Amazon may have been late to the app store game, but that hasn’t stopped it from ... -
Data Is Springboard For Product Development May 23, 4:44 p.m.
iProspect named Ben Wood to global president Thursday; he's tasked with growing the company's network and ... -
Vice, Twitter Partner For Mobile Show May 23, 2:14 p.m.
Simultaneously expanding its video and social strategy, Vice on Thursday unveiled #dailyvice -- a daily show ... -
MediaVest Database Charts Brand Experience, Social Media Impact May 23, 12:11 p.m.
After a year-long research effort, Publicis Groupe’s MediaVest has created a massive database designed to help ... -
Discovery Launches TestTube.com, Ups Digital Video Involvement May 23, 11:27 a.m.
Discovery Communications is looking to get into the digital video platforms in a big way -- ... -
Network Advertising Initiative Proposes New Mobile Privacy Rules May 22, 9:03 p.m.
Moving forward with its plan to issue mobile privacy rules, the self-regulatory group Network Advertising Initiative ... -
Entertainment, Travel Bet On Mobile Banners May 22, 4:16 p.m.
Banner ads have long been the whipping boy of online advertising, and the same is now ... -
Marketers Should Tailor Specific Pitches To Tablet, Smartphone May 22, 2:51 p.m.
Don’t lump tablets in with mobile. That’s the takeaway of a new Forrester study looking at ... -
Good TV Content Trumps All, Trad TV Or Streaming May 22, 2:42 p.m.
While consumers continue to perceive TV programming as superior in quality to that of online fare, ...


You need a double opt-in service so this doesn't happen to you. Ask me about it.