Anti-Piracy Bills Shelved, For Now
If nothing else, this week's protests against the Stop Online Piracy Act and Protect IP showed that online calls to action can be effective. Google, Craigslist, Wikipedia and countless other sites devoted online real estate to campaigns urging people to oppose the anti-piracy measures. Web users did so in droves. Google reported that more than 7 million people signed an online petition opposing the bills. At Wikipedia, more than 8 million people used an interactive tool to find the phone numbers of their representatives.
Faced with this unexpected populist backlash, dozens of lawmakers backed away from the controversial anti-piracy legislation. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) said this morning that he won't move forward with a vote on Protect IP that had been slated for Tuesday. In the House, Rep. Lamar Smith (R-Texas), said today that the Judiciary Committee won't resume its markup in February.
These developments represent a significant change from earlier this week, when both lawmakers insisted that they would press ahead with the bills. The recent backtracking marks an even bigger change from last year, when Protect IP unanimously cleared the Senate Judiciary Committee.
The Hollywood-backed bills target “rogue” Web sites that are dedicated to infringement, but the language in the bills is so broad that they could have an impact on many sites with user-generated content. Among other provisions, SOPA and Protect IP provide for court orders banning search engines from returning links to “rogue” sites, and also empower courts to prohibit credit card companies and ad networks from doing business with such sites. (The measures originally contained provisions requiring Internet service providers to block domains of rogue sites, but lawmakers said last week that they would drop those provisions.)
Opponents of the measures are cheering news that the bills are being shelved, but also acknowledge that efforts to pass new anti- piracy legislation are likely to continue. Digital rights groups and other opponents of SOPA and Protect IP say that the next round of bills should be the result of a process that includes a broad array of groups.
“At a minimum, Congress should start from scratch to determine the nature of the problem,” Public Knowledge legal director Harold Feld said in a statement. “If Congress goes ahead with legislation, it should hear widely from those concerned about the pending legislation -- from Internet technologists, from law professors, artists, human rights activists, consumers and even public interest groups. Only then will legislation be truly accepted and truly be effective.”
The Electronic Frontier Foundation agreed. “Now that the proponents of SOPA/PIPA have blinked, and taken the bills back to committee, there will be calls to come to a 'compromise,'” the group said in a blog post. “As we discuss the future of the Internet, all stakeholders, including the people who use Internet services and consume (and create and share) movies and music, must have a seat at the table. The internet is too important to be debated, dissected and possibly disabled in a private meeting.”
Recent Daily Online Examiner Articles
-
Apple Facing Uphill Battle In Ebook Trial May 24, 5:15 p.m.
Apple is slated to go on trial on June 3 for conspiring to increase the price ...
-
Penguin Shells Out $75 Million To Settle Price-Fixing Charges May 23, 4:45 p.m.
Penguin will pay $75 million to settle claims by a coalition of state attorneys general that ...
-
Airbnb Ruled Illegal In N.Y., User Hit With Four-Figure Fine May 22, 5:18 p.m.
New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg has made no secret of his hope that the city ...
-
AT&T Loosens Video Chat Restrictions May 21, 5:10 p.m.
Changing course, AT&T has decided to allow all users -- including those with unlimited data plans ...
-
Aereokiller Agrees To Change Name May 20, 4:38 p.m.
Aereokiller, embroiled in litigation with the TV networks, is putting at least one legal dispute behind ...
-
Appeals Court Turns Away Twitter's Challenge To Subpoena May 17, 4:55 p.m.
An appellate court in New York has dismissed Twitter's appeal of a ruling requiring it to ...
-
Apple: No 'Direct Evidence' Of Ebook Price-Fixing May 16, 5:10 p.m.
Did Apple conspire with book publishers to end Amazon's $9.99-per-ebook price? That's the question at the ...
-
AT&T Stirs Controversy With Data-Cap Plans May 15, 5 p.m.
AT&T CEO Randall Stephenson reportedly confirmed today that the carrier plans to let content companies pay ...
-
Pandora User Seeks To Revive Privacy Lawsuit May 14, 4:48 p.m.
In 2010, music service Pandora was one of the first companies to partner with Facebook for ...
-
New Bill Legalizes Cell-Phone Unlocking, DVD Ripping May 13, 5:05 p.m.
Consumers could once again have the right to unlock their cell phones, if a new law ...


Be the first to comment on "Anti-Piracy Bills Shelved, For Now"
Leave a Comment