Mobile Users Reject Tracking By Retailers
Last year, shortly before Black Friday, two malls announced plans to track shoppers' physical locations via their mobile phones. The malls -- Promenade Temecula in California and Short Pump Town Center in Virginia -- put up small signs notifying people of this plan and telling shoppers that they only way to avoid the tracking was to turn off their cell phones.
The malls intended to track people until the end of the year, but once news of the initiative got out, a backlash forced the shopping centers to retreat.
At the time, observers suspected that most consumers wouldn't be fond of this type of surveillance.
Now, researchers from UC Berkeley Law have confirmed that virtually no one thinks this type of tracking is acceptable. In a report issued this week, "Mobile Payments: Consumer Benefits & New Privacy Concerns," researchers say 96% of respondents in a recent survey said they didn't think their phones should share browsing information with stores. Seventy-nine percent of respondents said they would "definitely" not allow this type of tracking, while 17% said they "probably" wouldn't allow it.
Physical tracking by retailers is only one potential privacy issue raised by mobile phones. Another stems from the fact that phones can be configured to transmit data about users -- including email addresses and phone numbers -- when people use mobile payment systems
This type of disclosure also raises consumers' concerns, the researchers report.
More than eight in 10 survey respondents (81%), said they wouldn't want to let their phones transmit telephone numbers or addresses to stores. People weren't quite as protective of their email addresses, but 67% said they either "definitely" or "probably" wouldn't allow it.
"Overall, Americans strongly reject systems that would track them as they browsed stores and those that would share personal information with the merchant at the register," the report states.
Results are based on a survey in January and February of more than 1,200 people.
Recent Daily Online Examiner Articles
-
Penguin Shells Out $75 Million To Settle Price-Fixing Charges May 23, 4:45 p.m.
Penguin will pay $75 million to settle claims by a coalition of state attorneys general that ...
-
Airbnb Ruled Illegal In N.Y., User Hit With Four-Figure Fine May 22, 5:18 p.m.
New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg has made no secret of his hope that the city ...
-
AT&T Loosens Video Chat Restrictions May 21, 5:10 p.m.
Changing course, AT&T has decided to allow all users -- including those with unlimited data plans ...
-
Aereokiller Agrees To Change Name May 20, 4:38 p.m.
Aereokiller, embroiled in litigation with the TV networks, is putting at least one legal dispute behind ...
-
Appeals Court Turns Away Twitter's Challenge To Subpoena May 17, 4:55 p.m.
An appellate court in New York has dismissed Twitter's appeal of a ruling requiring it to ...
-
Apple: No 'Direct Evidence' Of Ebook Price-Fixing May 16, 5:10 p.m.
Did Apple conspire with book publishers to end Amazon's $9.99-per-ebook price? That's the question at the ...
-
AT&T Stirs Controversy With Data-Cap Plans May 15, 5 p.m.
AT&T CEO Randall Stephenson reportedly confirmed today that the carrier plans to let content companies pay ...
-
Pandora User Seeks To Revive Privacy Lawsuit May 14, 4:48 p.m.
In 2010, music service Pandora was one of the first companies to partner with Facebook for ...
-
New Bill Legalizes Cell-Phone Unlocking, DVD Ripping May 13, 5:05 p.m.
Consumers could once again have the right to unlock their cell phones, if a new law ...
-
Data-Cap Exemption For ESPN Raises Neutrality Concerns May 10, 6:40 p.m.
The sports network ESPN reportedly is talking with a major wireless carrier about a deal to ...


3 comments on "Mobile Users Reject Tracking By Retailers".
Leave a Comment