Facebook User Asks Appeals Court To Revive Privacy Lawsuit
In 2009, a report came out showing how social networks sometimes "leak" users' names to advertisers via referrer headers -- the URLs transmitted by publishers when users click on ads. While the report got a lot of attention, the issue itself wasn't new. Internet pioneer Tim Berners-Lee warned back in 1999 that referrer headers could leak information about Web users. But many users visited sites without creating profiles back then, which limits the risk that personal data will be leaked.
Shortly after the report came out, a host of companies -- including Facebook -- were hit with class-action lawsuits for allegedly violating users' privacy. Among other arguments, the Facebook user who sued, Mike Robertson, contended that the social networks broke promises spelled out in their privacy policies, which said that users' personally identifiable information wouldn't be shared with advertisers.
Last November, U.S. District Court Judge James Ware dismissed Robertson's case against Facebook before trial. Ware ruled that Robertson couldn't proceed because he hadn't been injured by the alleged disclosures. "Nominal damages and speculative harm do not suffice to show legally cognizable damage," Ware wrote at the time.
Now, Robertson is asking the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals to reinstate his lawsuit. "The personally-identifiable information at issue here is valuable not only to Facebook and its advertisers, but also to Facebook users," he argues in papers filed earlier this week.
It's hard to predict whether the 9th Circuit will revive this lawsuit. But even if Robertson doesn't get his day in court, Facebook must answer to the Federal Trade Commission for any future privacy glitches. The social networking service recently settled FTC charges by promising to obtain users' express consent before sharing their information more broadly than its privacy policy allowed when users uploaded the data.
That case largely stemmed from Facebook's December 2009 decision to reclassify a host of data as “public” -- including people's names, photos and friend lists. But the FTC charges also included an allegation that Facebook leaked users' names to advertisers via referrer headers.
Recent Daily Online Examiner Articles
-
Apple Facing Uphill Battle In Ebook Trial May 24, 5:15 p.m.
Apple is slated to go on trial on June 3 for conspiring to increase the price ...
-
Penguin Shells Out $75 Million To Settle Price-Fixing Charges May 23, 4:45 p.m.
Penguin will pay $75 million to settle claims by a coalition of state attorneys general that ...
-
Airbnb Ruled Illegal In N.Y., User Hit With Four-Figure Fine May 22, 5:18 p.m.
New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg has made no secret of his hope that the city ...
-
AT&T Loosens Video Chat Restrictions May 21, 5:10 p.m.
Changing course, AT&T has decided to allow all users -- including those with unlimited data plans ...
-
Aereokiller Agrees To Change Name May 20, 4:38 p.m.
Aereokiller, embroiled in litigation with the TV networks, is putting at least one legal dispute behind ...
-
Appeals Court Turns Away Twitter's Challenge To Subpoena May 17, 4:55 p.m.
An appellate court in New York has dismissed Twitter's appeal of a ruling requiring it to ...
-
Apple: No 'Direct Evidence' Of Ebook Price-Fixing May 16, 5:10 p.m.
Did Apple conspire with book publishers to end Amazon's $9.99-per-ebook price? That's the question at the ...
-
AT&T Stirs Controversy With Data-Cap Plans May 15, 5 p.m.
AT&T CEO Randall Stephenson reportedly confirmed today that the carrier plans to let content companies pay ...
-
Pandora User Seeks To Revive Privacy Lawsuit May 14, 4:48 p.m.
In 2010, music service Pandora was one of the first companies to partner with Facebook for ...
-
New Bill Legalizes Cell-Phone Unlocking, DVD Ripping May 13, 5:05 p.m.
Consumers could once again have the right to unlock their cell phones, if a new law ...


1 comment on "Facebook User Asks Appeals Court To Revive Privacy Lawsuit".
Leave a Comment