Judge Rejects 'Sponsored Stories' Settlement

A federal judge has rejected the proposed settlement of a class-action lawsuit about Facebook's sponsored stories program.

 

U.S. District Court Judge Richard Seeborg in the Northern District of California ruled late Friday that the proposed settlement raised too many questions to warrant approval. But Seeborg also said that his decision is without prejudice, meaning that the parties can beef up their arguments to address his concerns, and then try again to win approval of the deal.

 

The proposed deal called for Facebook to donate $10 million to various advocacy organizations and law schools -- but nothing to Facebook users who were featured in sponsored stories. The company also promised not to oppose a request by the consumers' lawyers for up to $10 million in attorneys' fees. Additionally, Facebook said it would give users more control over sponsored stories in the future -- though only minors will be allowed to opt out of appearing in ads.

 

One of the major problems flagged by Seeborg is that the deal doesn't call for any monetary damages to Facebook users. The social networking service was sued for allegedly violating a California law providing that companies need consumers' permission before using their names or images in endorsements. That law -- which also specifies that minors' images can't be used in endorsements without their parents' permission -- provides for damages of $750 per incident.

 

Facebook and the consumers argued the deal should be approved because the potential damages were otherwise so large that payments to individuals weren't practical, according to Seeborg's opinion. But he questioned whether that in itself was a good reason to structure a so-called "cy pres" settlement -- which involves payment to outside organizations in lieu of to the people directly affected. "The issue this presents appears to be a novel one: Can a cy pres-only settlement be justified on the basis that the class size is simply too large for direct monetary relief? Or, notwithstanding the strong policy favoring settlements, are some class actions simply too big to settle?" Seeborg wrote.

 

The judge additionally found problems with Facebook's promise to pay up to $10 million in attorneys' fees to the lawyers who brought the case. The Center for Public Interest Law, which was among the groups opposing the settlement, argued earlier that it was "doubtful" that lawyers for the consumers deserved $10 million for their work on the case.

 

The lawyers haven't yet applied for attorneys' fees; when they do, they will have to convince Seeborg that the amount requested fairly compensates them. Seeborg said on Friday that if the lawyers can't justify $10 million, then Facebook's promise not to contest that figure could be relevant to whether the settlement was fair. "If, and to the extent, that only a much smaller fee award can ultimately be justified here, then the fact that Facebook has agreed to pay up to $20 million (plus up to $300,000 in costs) to resolve this action may be of some consequence in evaluating the adequacy and fairness of the cy pres amount," the judge wrote.

 

The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals (which encompasses the Northern District of California) is increasingly scrutinizing class-action settlements -- especially where lawyers receive money but consumers don't. That court recently rejected a proposed class-action settlement in a lawsuit alleging that Motorola didn't disclose the risk of hearing loss posed by Bluetooth headsets. The proposed settlement would have required Motorola to donate $100,000 to various health-related organizations, while the attorneys who sued would have received $800,000.

In its order rejecting the settlement, the 9th Circuit said one sign of a questionable deal is "when the class receives no monetary distribution but class counsel are amply rewarded."

 

Tags: facebook, privacy
Recommend (2) Print RSS
All content published by MediaPost is determined by our editors 100% in the interest of our readers ... independent of advertising, sponsorships or other considerations.
  • Mississippi Officials Planned To Enlist MPAA In 'Media Blitz' Against Google

    An official from the Mississippi Attorney General's office proposed that the Motion Picture Association of America help coordinate a "media blitz" against Google -- which would include arranging for bad press on NBC's Today Show and in News Corp's The Wall Street Journal -- according to new court documents. The ...
  • FCC Chairman Backs AT&T's Merger With DirecTV

    AT&T's $49 billion merger with DirecTV appears to be headed for regulatory approval, Federal Communications Commission Chairman Tom Wheeler indicated on Tuesday. "An order recommending that the AT&T/DirecTV transaction be approved with conditions has circulated to the Commissioners," Wheeler said in a statement. The proposed order includes two conditions related ...
  • Google Wins Reprieve From Mississippi Attorney General

    A federal judge has granted Google's request for an order enjoining Mississippi Attorney General Jim Hood from following enforcing a subpoena for “millions” of documents relating to copyright infringement by outside companies. The preliminary injunction, issued on Monday by U.S. District Court Judge Henry Wingate in Jackson, Miss., stays Hood's ...
  • FCC Enacts Sweeping Open Internet Rules

    The Federal Communications Commission voted on Thursday to impose net neutrality rules that prohibit broadband providers from blocking or degrading traffic and from creating online fast lanes. “Today history is being made by a majority of this commission as we vote for a fast, fair and open internet,” Chairman Tom ...
  • Nick.com Visitors Seek To Revive Privacy Case Against Google And Viacom

    Representatives for a group of young children are appealing a judge's decision to dismiss a lawsuit accusing Google and Viacom of violating a federal video privacy law. The notice of appeal, which was filed this week with the 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals, doesn't offer details about the potential arguments ...
  • Coca-Cola Talks "Total Market" Multicultural Marketing

    Segmenting remains a natural component of multicultural marketing. Yet, top brands increasingly want separate units to share insights, and a broader strategy. It’s a “total market” according to Juan Pablo Gonzalez, Senior Brand Manager of Hispanic Marketing at Coca-Cola. Among other benefits, “It gives up an opportunity to share resources,” ...
  • "50 Shades Of Skin" Isn't The Way To Approach Multicultural Markets

    When approaching multicultural consumer segments, marketers shouldn’t go thinking about “50 Shades of Skin,” according to Xavier Turpin, Director of Multicultural Marketing at Dunkin Brands. “It’s wrong to label all these segments based on skin color,” Turpin told attendees of MediaPost’s Engage: Hispanics conference, on Tuesday. “What’s more important is ...
  • Finding programmatic revenue -- or lead-generation value

    Programmatic may yield too low cost per thousand prices for many publishers. Still, others who even sell premium video inventory find value. During a OMMA Miami panel, Daren Trousdell, founder/chief executive officer of OneUp Sports says: “Programmatic is a lead-generation tool for us; we can see who is bidding on ...
  • Audi Taps MUH-TAY-ZIK I HOF-FER For Social

    Audi of America has tapped San Francisco-based MUH-TAY-ZIK | HOF-FER as its social media agency. Audi says it choose the agency Audi after seeing their work for clients like Netflix, Golden State Warriors, and Slavery Footprint.
  • FCC Chairman Unveils Plan For 'Strongest Open Internet Protections' In Agency's History

    Federal Communications Commission Chairman Tom Wheeler said on Monday that he will propose that the agency declare broadband service a utility, in order to enact “the strongest open internet protections” in the agency's history. “These enforceable, bright-line rules will ban paid prioritization, and the blocking and throttling of lawful content ...
>> Raw Archives