I’m as far as you can get from an “I hate pink” critic of the breast cancer cause-marketing phenomenon, but I am frustrated by the number of bad to mediocre campaigns that emerge each October. These “me too” efforts damage the credibility of companies doing an outstanding job of mixing cause with commerce.
This month you can find many terrific, transparent, well-conceived, well-funded and well-executed campaigns in the marketplace like Yoplait’s Save Lids to Save Lives and Avon’s multifaceted Breast Cancer Crusade. Unfortunately, for every five-star initiative, there are dozens of shallow programs that fail to follow fundamental best practices such as transparency.
Here are two examples of programs that, in my opinion, are unclear and miserly in their contributions:
It’s time for all companies and nonprofits partnering on breast cancer campaigns to comply with these three widely accepted cause marketing best practices:
1) WHERE does the money go? “Breast cancer awareness, treatment, cure, etc.” is not descriptive enough. Work with a reputable 501c3 and make it clear to consumers who’s involved.
2) HOW MUCH money from products/services purchased goes to the designated charity? Statements such as “ten percent of net proceeds” are overly vague. Even “one hundred percent of net proceeds” could very well equal zero. Marketers, don’t be tricky here. What portion of the purchase price are you donating?
3) WHAT MINIMUM or MAXIMUM will be donated? Perhaps there’s a campaign minimum (“no matter what happens, we’ll donate $5,000”) or a cap to this charitable effort (“up to a maximum of $10,000”).
Marketers, do yourselves -- and everyone who believes in the power of cause marketing a favor -- lay your cards on the table to earn consumers’ trust.