Facebook Critic Asks 9th Circuit To Reconsider Beacon Settlement
Facebook must have thought that it had finally put an end to the fallout from its doomed Beacon ad program in September. That's when a three-judge panel of a federal appeals court voted 2-1 to uphold a settlement requiring Facebook to pay $6.5 million to create a new privacy foundation.
But that decision might not be the last word on the matter. Facebook user Ginger McCall, who also works for the Electronic Privacy Information Center, has filed papers asking for further review by a larger panel of the appellate court.
She argues that the two judges who voted to uphold the settlement as "fundamentally fair" weren't skeptical enough about the deal.
McCall has a point. The settlement calls for Facebook to pay around $6.5 million to create a new privacy foundation. While that in itself might not raise eyebrows, the structure of the foundation will leave Facebook wielding a huge amount of control over it. That's because the new organization is supposed to be directed by a three-person board -- and Facebook will play a key role in selecting those people. (One of the board members was supposed to be Facebook's public policy director, Tim Sparapani, but he left the company last year.)*
The deal also requires Facebook to pay around $2.5 million to the attorneys who brought the case. But individual users who were blindsided by the ad program -- which shared their purchases with their friends -- won't see a dime (except for the 19 who let their names be used in the complaint).
McCall's petition for further review might get some traction, if only because the earlier decision to uphold the settlement wasn't unanimous. Senior Circuit Judge Andrew Kleinfeld dissented, writing that the deal "perverts the class action into a device for depriving victims of remedies for wrongs, while enriching both the wrongdoers and the lawyers purporting to represent the class." He added: "Facebook deprived its users of their privacy. And now they are deprived of a remedy."
*This post has been corrected to reflect that Tim Sparapani no longer works at Facebook
Recent Daily Online Examiner Articles
-
Appeals Court Turns Away Twitter's Challenge To Subpoena May 17, 4:55 p.m.
An appellate court in New York has dismissed Twitter's appeal of a ruling requiring it to ...
-
Apple: No 'Direct Evidence' Of Ebook Price-Fixing May 16, 5:10 p.m.
Did Apple conspire with book publishers to end Amazon's $9.99-per-ebook price? That's the question at the ...
-
AT&T Stirs Controversy With Data-Cap Plans May 15, 5 p.m.
AT&T CEO Randall Stephenson reportedly confirmed today that the carrier plans to let content companies pay ...
-
Pandora User Seeks To Revive Privacy Lawsuit May 14, 4:48 p.m.
In 2010, music service Pandora was one of the first companies to partner with Facebook for ...
-
New Bill Legalizes Cell-Phone Unlocking, DVD Ripping May 13, 5:05 p.m.
Consumers could once again have the right to unlock their cell phones, if a new law ...
-
Data-Cap Exemption For ESPN Raises Neutrality Concerns May 10, 6:40 p.m.
The sports network ESPN reportedly is talking with a major wireless carrier about a deal to ...
-
Righthaven Loses Bid To Revive Lawsuits May 9, 6:20 p.m.
Several years ago, attorney Steven Gibson and the publisher of the Las Vegas Review-Journal cooked up ...
-
Appellate Judge Says Google Books Offers 'Enormous' Benefits May 8, 4:59 p.m.
The Authors Guild's odds of winning its long-running lawsuit against Google appear to be dwindling, at ...
-
FTC Tells Data Brokers To Follow Consumer Protection Laws May 7, 6:30 p.m.
In its latest move against data brokers, the Federal Trade Commission has warned 10 companies that ...
-
FTC Rejects Request To Delay New Children's Privacy Rules May 6, 7:43 p.m.
The Federal Trade Commission has unanimously turned down a request by industry groups to push back ...
Be the first to comment on "Facebook Critic Asks 9th Circuit To Reconsider Beacon Settlement"
Leave a Comment