Commentary

Using Mobile to Help Consumers Buy In-Store

What is the ultimate role of the mobile device in the hands of sales associates?

For the last several days I’ve been pondering the recent Harris poll earlier showing that the majority (59%) of smartphone-armed showroomers prefer looking up product information on their phone to asking salespeople for help.

While there may be anecdotal research indicating that shoppers typically ask a sales person to direct them to the location of a product, that majority mobile preference number still seems significant.

We know from various studies that consumers want to shop and buy in a physical store, making brick and mortar a potential huge asset for retailers facing mobile shoppers.

Research also shows that consumers will use their mobile devices in-store.

This begs the question of what is the role of the sales associate in relation to the mobile shopper, especially in light of the consumer desire not to deal with salespeople?

It may be that some consumers perceive that the salesperson is going to try to sell them something, since that is part of their job title.

Some mobile implementations at retail involve providing salespeople with smartphones or tablets, with an eye toward using devices to find and share additional product information or even expedite checkout.

But what if rather than using mobile devices in trying to sell, salespeople used them to help consumers buy?

The difference may seem subtle, but could be based on what the consumer wants or needs vs. what the seller is trying to sell.

Picture this scenario: I walk into Best Buy, select a new flat-screen computer monitor, find it and bring it to a sales associate in that department to pay.

The sales associate looks up my rewards number and notes that I am one of their best customers.

The salesperson “let’s make sure you’re getting the best deal here.”

The salesperson takes out his company-issued smartphone, opens an app like ShopSavvy or Amazon Price Check, and scans the product barcode. 

“I see this monitor is $25 less at Staples and $30 cheaper at Amazon, Mr. Martin. How about we match that price and deduct $30?”

Companies like Best Buy already have price matching policies in place, even if not all consumers are familiar with them.

In the scenario, the consumer is assured they got the best deal and if not totally mobile savvy, are shown how to use mobile to instantly price-compare. (Part of the equation is obviously to consider the measurement metrics of profit margins compared to customer retention.)

Would you tend to frequent the retailer that always made sure you got the best deal?

I’m sure you can come up with numerous variations of this price matching scenario or others involving best uses of mobile at retail, so feel free to send them along.

The process of adapting to mobile shoppers at physical outlets is still in the early stages with a long way to go.

__________________________________________________

OMMA mCommerce, July 15, New York. MasterCard, Joule, ScanBuy, Huge, Spyderlynk, Rue La La, BYNDL, Catalina, Giant Eagle, Payvia, Ansible, Moxie Interactive coming. Here’s the AGENDA.

7 comments about "Using Mobile to Help Consumers Buy In-Store".
Check to receive email when comments are posted.
  1. Erika Sosa from TrialPay, Inc., June 7, 2013 at 2:39 p.m.

    Checkout how TrialPay is already exercising this concept! http://prn.to/12vhPf1

  2. Chuck Martin from Chuck Martin, June 7, 2013 at 3:12 p.m.

    Thanks for point this out, Erika, though it seems to be more aimed at incentives and transactions rather than at the role of the sales associate in the store.

  3. Robi Ganguly from Apptentive, June 7, 2013 at 3:14 p.m.

    Chuck, this is a fantastic line of thinking. There is a lot of room for innovation around taking mobile into a place where the purchase process is more personal and tailored to the consumers' needs. Being able to look someone in the eye, help them get what they want and to reassure them about their purchasing decisions is a uniquely offline opportunity and I'd love to see retailers doing more to emphasize this, rather than competing purely on price and diminishing service in the process.

  4. Chuck Martin from Chuck Martin, June 7, 2013 at 3:24 p.m.

    Thank you very much, Robi, appreciated. Agree that some rather major transformation in interacting with mobile shoppers is needed. This kind of change is difficult with the pressure of quarterly results, but the retailer that figures this out -- that is, the mobilized salesperson can actually be on the side of the shopper -- will ultimately win. Will be interesting who steps up.

  5. Chuck Martin from Chuck Martin, June 7, 2013 at 3:34 p.m.

    Thanks Timo, appreciated.Also agree about its importance across channels (me new book on this, Mobile Influence, out next week!).

  6. Jeremy Geiger from Retailigence, June 8, 2013 at 6:10 p.m.

    Chuck: I like the forward thinking. But given the cost advantage that eTailers have, it's hard to see that as sustainable for Brick&Mortar retailers. But I think you touched on another key point -- personalization. Giving the shopper the "offer" (not necessarily only price, although price/convenience is 1 dimension), that is personalized to their preferences.

  7. Chuck Martin from Chuck Martin, June 8, 2013 at 9:10 p.m.

    Thanks, Jeremy, and agree that personalization is the key, which is what we were aiming at here. And you may be right about sustainability, though there may be some opportunities in customer tiering in that regard, with preference and price as some of the factors, as well as inventory availability (matching demand with supply in real time).

Next story loading loading..