Gaming Snafu Latest In Series Of DRM Flubs
Apparently, the game's certificate expired on Jan. 28, and the only way people could continue playing was to reset their computers' clocks to an earlier date, Ars Technica reports.
While players managed to find a workaround, this snafu isn't the only instance of digital rights management software causing problems. In the past, a bungled attempt by Sony to bundle anti-piracy software with music CDs resulted in the company agreeing to pay $1.5 million to settle spyware charges.
Meanwhile, at least three digital music retailers -- Wal-Mart, Yahoo and MSN -- recently said they intended to stop supporting the digital rights management software that was bundled with tracks they sold. The moves led to outcry by digital rights group and all three companies reversed their decisions -- at least for now.
In the gaming world, Electronic Arts was sued last year over the game "Spore," which came with digital rights management software prohibiting users from installing the game on more than three computers. One allegation was that company hadn't informed consumers about the anti-piracy software and its limits in advance.
If digital rights management software actually prevented piracy, companies' continued use of it might be understandable. But there's no indication that sophisticated pirates are even slowed down by the programs. Law-abiding consumers, on the other hand, can end up stuck with games they can't play and music they can't listen to as a result of digital rights management programs.
With complaints mounting, the Federal Trade Commission is gearing up for a conference about digital rights management on March 25 in Seattle. One of the issues up for discussion is whether companies need to do a better job at informing consumers about digital rights management and its limitations.
0 comments on "Gaming Snafu Latest In Series Of DRM Flubs".
Leave a Comment
Recent Daily Online Examiner Articles
-
Aereokiller Agrees To Change Name May 20, 4:38 p.m.
Aereokiller, embroiled in litigation with the TV networks, is putting at least one legal dispute behind ...
-
Appeals Court Turns Away Twitter's Challenge To Subpoena May 17, 4:55 p.m.
An appellate court in New York has dismissed Twitter's appeal of a ruling requiring it to ...
-
Apple: No 'Direct Evidence' Of Ebook Price-Fixing May 16, 5:10 p.m.
Did Apple conspire with book publishers to end Amazon's $9.99-per-ebook price? That's the question at the ...
-
AT&T Stirs Controversy With Data-Cap Plans May 15, 5 p.m.
AT&T CEO Randall Stephenson reportedly confirmed today that the carrier plans to let content companies pay ...
-
Pandora User Seeks To Revive Privacy Lawsuit May 14, 4:48 p.m.
In 2010, music service Pandora was one of the first companies to partner with Facebook for ...
-
New Bill Legalizes Cell-Phone Unlocking, DVD Ripping May 13, 5:05 p.m.
Consumers could once again have the right to unlock their cell phones, if a new law ...
-
Data-Cap Exemption For ESPN Raises Neutrality Concerns May 10, 6:40 p.m.
The sports network ESPN reportedly is talking with a major wireless carrier about a deal to ...
-
Righthaven Loses Bid To Revive Lawsuits May 9, 6:20 p.m.
Several years ago, attorney Steven Gibson and the publisher of the Las Vegas Review-Journal cooked up ...
-
Appellate Judge Says Google Books Offers 'Enormous' Benefits May 8, 4:59 p.m.
The Authors Guild's odds of winning its long-running lawsuit against Google appear to be dwindling, at ...
-
FTC Tells Data Brokers To Follow Consumer Protection Laws May 7, 6:30 p.m.
In its latest move against data brokers, the Federal Trade Commission has warned 10 companies that ...


It's great to see that something is finally being done to stop these companies from abusing their customers. Maybe I'll buy Sims 3 if EA is prevented from installing that malware in the game. As it is I am through with the Sims until EA shows that it has respect for me as a customer.
Blocking access to a game is not good business. Clearly, more needs to be done to require companies to disclose their DRM policies. Still, I would be cautious to label a few incidences as a series of snafus. DRM is necessary for the survival of content creators http://www.aladdin.com/SoftwarePiracyBlog/default.aspx It just has to work for everyone, every time, which is really not such a big challenge