Commentary

Earth Day In A New Era

This year, Earth Day is the perfect moment to take a step back and look at how far the socially conscious environmental movement has come to have a clearer picture of where we are headed. After decades of over-indulgence, materialism and living beyond our means with readily available credit, consumers came to a rather rude awakening this past fall that the party was over, and the hangover has just begun.

Americans were suddenly faced with a dire economic backdrop and the reality of decreased purchasing power, whether as a direct result of a job loss or indirectly through decreased job security and a devaluation of their homes and financial investments.

Now forced to reconsider their purchasing behaviors, more consumers are taking the time to consider long-planned or long-considered lifestyle changes. As a result of being inundated about the perils of global warming, followed by $4 gas, consumers are returning to the basics, and savvy corporations are beginning to follow suit.

Over the past few months, marketers have been peppered with news of the changing attitudes and behaviors of consumers. According to a recent New York Times/CBS News poll, 70% of respondents were very or somewhat concerned that someone in their household would be out of work and looking for a job in the next 12 months.

Consumers are changing their purchasing behaviors to follow suit. According to the poll, 40% said they had cut spending on luxuries, demonstrating that luxury products are no longer viewed upon with envy but as a sign of the times gone bad.

Consumers are returning to the basics such as eating at home, spending time with family and even gardening. According to a survey from the National Gardening Association, there is a 19% increase in the number of Americans who plan to plant a garden this year. Although the recession is clearly a driver, consumers are also being driven by lifestyle concerns issues such as health and the environment.

Moreover, despite a very challenging economic environment where consumers are looking everywhere to cut back, socially conscious, environmentally friendly products remain en vogue. According to NBC's "Green is Universal" poll, 60% of consumers are willing to pay more for environmentally responsible products from brands they trust. Sixty-two percent say, "I am buying more environmentally responsible products than I did a year ago," while 73% believe that "green" is good for the economy.

Consumer attitudes are not just confined to the products they buy; they extend to the companies that make those products as well. According to the NBC poll, 85% of respondents say that companies have a social reponsibility to protect the environment while 19% say they have boycotted a company/product in the past year because it had policies and practices that were not environmentally responisible.

The trend appears near its tipping point with 86% agreeing that "green" is becoming more popular. The NBC poll was reinforced by the 2009 BBMG Conscious Consumer Report, which found that 77% of consumers agree that they can make a positive impact by purchasing products from socially or environmentally responsible companies and they are actively seeking information about it.

From 2007 to 2008, there were double-digit increases in the importance of green benefits such as energy efficiency, natural, organic or made with recycled materials. Despite financial hardship, 67% of consumers agree that even in tough economic time, it is important to purchase products with social and environmental benefits.

Implications for Marketers

Major shifts in consumer attitudes such as this bring great opportunities and great risks for marketers. For savvy marketers, there is an opportunity to endear themselves to their current customers and to connect in a meaningful way with new consumers.

The emerging class of mainstream conscious consumers are on a hunt for new information and new products which reflect their changing values. They are seeking partners in what appears to be a very fragmented sector but tend to show great loyalty when relationships are formed.

For marketers addressing emerging mainstream trends, it is somewhat challenging to define as consumers exhibit paradoxical behavior. However, as consumers continue to come to grips with their own choices, they tend to be accepting of honest brokers who attempt to help them in their quest.

The rewards for the savvy marketer are great, as they will be positioned on stable ground for years to come with the ability to gain market share as well as enter new markets stronger. For complacent marketers, the risk is simply irrelevance becomming the perverbial Spam of modern day.

Editor's note: If you'd like to contribute to this newsletter, see our editorial guidelines first and then contact Nina Lentini.

3 comments about "Earth Day In A New Era ".
Check to receive email when comments are posted.
  1. Jonathan Hutter from Northern Light Health, April 23, 2009 at 4:46 p.m.

    I don't disagree with anything Todd says here. But, have we reached the green saturation point? The real driver is economics, not the altruistic goal. If environmentally friendly products are considered "en vogue," they can just as easily become "de mode" (god I hope my French is correct).

    Earth Day is a once a year thing. Environmentally responsible behavior, and the marketing that encourages it, is not a specialty, but an ongoing sensibility. Much as children of the depression didn't consider frugality a style. They were brought up that way.

  2. Robert Viney from Interactive Commerce Solutions, April 24, 2009 at 2:28 p.m.

    Having first begun to work in this area in the late 1980's, what we're seeing now is a new spike in a trend that's been growing slowly buy consistently over the past 25 years. It peaked in the 80's based on solid waste concerns, and has peaked again due to sustainability, energy and climate change.

    But the fundamentals are still the same . . . people want to make changes in what companies they deal with, and they want better choices in the products and packages they buy so their quality of life is maintained while the environmental impact is reduced. Some will pay a bit more, some won't; some will be inconvenienced, some wont'. Most expect "the system" of government and industry leaders to give them new options so they don't have to make big tradeoffs.

    What people want from companies is long term commitment to action. They want straightforward, understandable information about how a company's products are fitting in with the new environmental realities and needs. They will reward that. They will punish companies that only talk about their "caring" about the environment, they want companies to be "taking action" and talking about their actions. A company that doesn't get that when they step into "green marketing" will get burned. . . by either consumers, activists or government regulators.

    For guidance, check out the FTC Guidelines at http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/grnrule/guides980427.htm. These were originally drafted by an industry led group, and later incorporated into formal guidelines. There are examples of "good" and "not so good" claim statements there, and the logic behind each. It's a great starting point if you're venturing into this area . . . it's not an untrodden path.

  3. Dean Collins from Cognation Inc, April 29, 2009 at 11:51 a.m.

    Yeh but just dont try and trademark that colour

    http://www.colourlovers.com/blog/2007/11/04/beware-t-mobile-owns-the-color-magenta

Next story loading loading..