The 'Sushi Approach' To Simplifying Online Video Advertising
Each campaign is different, and each targeted audience calls for a new mix in both message and presentation. I like to think of the wide variety of available ad units in terms of sushi: There are lots of different styles, but only a few key families (i.e., sashimi, nigiri, rolls).
This sushi analogy can be useful in helping clients to plan campaigns. Instead of presenting clients that are less familiar with video with a flurry of industry jargon that includes pre-roll, mid-roll, post-roll, expandable, overlay, ticker, bumper, bug, interstitial, floating ad, takeover, etc., I find it useful to break things into a few simple families: in-stream, in-banner, and page-level (which includes units like interstitials, floating ads, and page takeovers). This way, you can unclutter your value proposition for potentially timid online video advertising customers, and leave them feeling that they've found the optimal ad mix for their marketing spend.
So what does this mean for the industry? As we move more and more toward flexible pricing models and hybrid video buys, standardization of terminology and education becomes a paramount issue when working with media buying partners. By presenting the potential formats as "families," it's easier to summarize the pros and cons for individual campaign buys. After that, it's easier to determine which "styles" will be most effective.
Let's look at a few of the high-level pros and cons associated with each of the families described above:
In-Stream
Well-understood (and most complementary) when compared to traditional television ads
Easy to develop if using existing television assets
Tends to have highest completed views and click-through rates
High engagement due to a "captured" audience
Tends to receive user backlash due to intrusiveness
Repurposed television ads may not be best-suited for this purpose
Inventory is generally more expensive than display inventory
In-Banner
Easy-to-find, relatively inexpensive display inventory
Can be easily sold on a performance basis
Relatively unintrusive (as long as it doesn't auto start with sound)
Offers many opportunities for rich-media customization
Often not as engaging as in-stream or page-level
May not be seen if appearing below the fold
If trafficked via an exchange, may not provide desired transparency into site placements
Page-Level
Extremely engaging
Affords tremendous potential for creative freedom
Offers lots of flexibility for rich media customization
Great for building awareness and other top of funnel metrics
Can be quite expensive, depending upon where it's being run
If not user-initiated, can be very intrusive and annoying to the user
May require considerable design work
In summary, the online video advertising world is changing. It's more flexible, diverse and rife with opportunities -- but media buyers can only take advantage of this more favorable atmosphere if they can clearly understand the benefits and downfalls of all their purchase elements. In this increasingly complex world of video ad unit formats, let's start with the "sushi roll" before diving into the "tempura shrimp wrapped in grilled unagi and avocado."
0 comments on "The 'Sushi Approach' To Simplifying Online Video Advertising".
Leave a Comment
Recent Video Insider Articles
-
Three Lessons Digital Video Advertisers Should Learn from Direct Marketing May 20, 6:13 p.m.
As a consumer, I often see pre-roll ads on my phone, Roku, Wii, tablet and PC. ...
-
Once Again: Are You STILL Making These Fatal Video Content Mistakes? May 17, 11:10 a.m.
No one plans to make bad marketing videos. Yet, the majority of them ARE bad. And ...
-
Cable and Broadcast in TV Everywhere's Bed; In-Stream Engagement Strong May 16, 10:10 a.m.
Perhaps the most important story to emerge from the TV upfronts isn’t the next hot hour-long ...
-
What If Yahoo Bought TV Guide? May 15, 9:50 a.m.
I may be dating myself here, but I still remember when families sifted through the print ...
-
Mister Rogers: No Tattoos, But Wisdom To Spare May 14, 12:53 p.m.
Ten years after his death in 2003, Fred Rogers -- aka Mister Rogers -- is back ...
-
Content Is Consuming Us: If You Can't Beat 'Em, Join 'Em May 13, 12:53 p.m.
Two years ago, the inventor of the Web browser Marc Andreessen commented that software is eating ...
-
People Are People Are People: The Future Of Video May 10, 10:44 a.m.
“I think I just passed by Sarah Jessica Parker, and btw I’m much taller than her,” ...
-
Smart TV Reach Doubles, Tablet Owners Heavy SVOD Users May 9, 4:50 p.m.
Advertisers, take note: Consumers are getting savvier at connecting their TVs to the Internet, and interacting ...
-
Breaking The Bandwidth Barrier: Enabling Effective Video Ads May 8, 9:30 a.m.
On YouTube, four billion hours of video are viewed every month, and 72 hours of video ...
-
The New Rules Of Content May 7, 12:37 p.m.
If brand-conscious Martians landed on planet earth and wanted to market themselves, and we offered them ...


I like your article and simple breakdown. I am always consulting custoimers on the merits of the various types. I agree for the most part but I would give higher grades to the in-story 300x250 video banners. I worked with one that had as high as a 3% (not point 3) click through to a Las Vegas area car dealer website. Ever since that I've been sold on that size too. The trick is in the creative. Again good write up. Thanks for the insight.
All very nice, but you only look at the pro's and con's from the advertisers' point of view. Lasting succes will only be achieved once online advertising is looked at from the users' perspective. Remember who made the internet big, sorry HUGE? The user, not the advertiser. And the user is always right. In a Search Driven environment especially, internet users will not accept any intrusiveness, delay or anything that throws up an obstacle. We pride ourselves at You View TV to have developed an advertising model that works both for the user and the advertiser. (i.e. http://www.LetsCookit.tv)