Study: DO Billboards Are Safe, Really

by , Nov 20, 2009, 5:14 PM
  • Comment (1)
  • Recommend (10)
Subscribe to Digital Outsider
A new study from Tantala Associates, commissioned by the Outdoor Advertising Association of America, hammers home the point that digital billboards are not correlated with traffic accidents. This finding provides additional ammunition to billboard owners trying to persuade local governments and community organizations that the eye-catching displays are safe.

The new Tantala study -- the third in a series performed for the OAAA -- returned to Cuyahoga County, Ohio, which includes Cleveland and its surrounding suburbs. Tantala reviewed police records for 60,000 traffic accidents taking place in the county over an eight-year period, comparing accident rates from a four-year period before digital billboards were installed with the four-year period following their installation.

Tantala analyzed data documenting the location, time of day, and the direction and speed of the vehicles involved in each accident (including accidents on stretches of road where digital billboards are visible, as well as accidents elsewhere) and found there is no statistical correlation between accidents and visual exposure to digital billboards, by day or night. Rather, Tantala found that overall accident rates in the county have decreased over the last four years, even on stretches of road where digital billboards are visible.

This study reinforces Tantala's findings in its two previous studies of the issue. In April Tantala published the results of its analysis of police records documenting 18,000 traffic accidents that took place in the area of Rochester, N.Y., over a five-year period, which also showed no statistical correlation between digital billboards and accidents. Two years before that Tantala completed its first study of accident rates in the Cleveland metro area for the OAAA.

Around the same time as the first Tantala study, Virginia Tech completed a survey about the effects of signs on drivers. Conducted by the Center for Automotive Safety Research at Virginia Tech's Transportation Institute, the study observed measures like eye-glance patterns, speed maintenance and lane-keeping, and found no substantial changes in behavior patterns in the presence of digital signage.

Traffic safety has been a hot topic in the ongoing public debate over digital billboards, with opponents claiming the displays' bright lights and motion distract drivers and cause accidents. However, the last couple years have also seen increasing opposition on purely aesthetic and economic grounds: some neighborhood associations in Los Angeles, for example, say digital billboards are unsightly and lower property values.

0 comments on "Study: DO Billboards Are Safe, Really".

  1. Marc Roth
    commented on: December 3, 2009 at 5:48 p.m.

    Straw poll much?

    Maybe I'm actually bias just because billboards let me down in Las Vegas. I hate when I catch a glimpse of something on a digiboard and then it switches to something. I mean seriously I'd like to know what phone number to call for half off of cirque shows, I don't know that I'm as interested in Kotex's new campaign.

    In summary, digiboards = good for Kotex branding bad for Garth Brooks actual ticket sales.

Leave a Comment

Sign in to leave a comment. Don't have an account? Join Now

Recent Digital Outsider Articles

» Digital Outsider Archives