After Criticism, Scribd Changes Privacy Settings
Despite the well-publicized privacy headaches that this type of feature has caused other companies, Scribd launched Readcast on an opt-out basis. That is, the first time people used Scribd after the Readcast launched, the company showed them a screen allowing them to opt out of posting the document to their public Scribd profiles. If users exited the screen without changing the default settings, the documents they downloaded were added to their public profiles.
The move drew relatively little attention until last week, when Santa Clara University law professor Eric Goldman wrote about it on his blog. "I don't feel I got adequate notice of the change. Haven't they learned anything from Facebook's Beacon fiasco or Google's Buzz fiasco?" he wrote. "Since apparently the message isn't sinking in, let me spell out what should have been obvious: People don't want to automatically publicly announce the documents they are reading."
By today, Scribd revised the feature to make it opt-in. People now must affirmatively instruct the company to broadcast information about what documents they are reading to other users.
Also today, Scribd joined Facebook's controversial instant personalization program. But, in a significant departure from some other companies to use instant personalization, Scribd will only enroll new users in the platform.
The company says that when new users sign up for an account, they will be given the option to participate in Facebook's instant personalization platform; if users don't make a choice, they will be opted-in by default. In that case, the documents that users download won't show up on their Facebook profiles unless they specifically direct Scribd to share that information.
Scribd will, however, use people's Facebook information to recommend documents for them to read; those recommendations will not be broadcast to other Facebook or Scribd users.
Facebook's decision to roll out instant personalization on an opt-out basis and tell outside companies the names of their users without those people's explicit permission remains extremely problematic. But at least Scribd appears to be reversing course on a troubling decision to share data about what people are reading without their affirmative consent.
0 comments on "After Criticism, Scribd Changes Privacy Settings".
Leave a Comment
Recent Daily Online Examiner Articles
-
AT&T Loosens Video Chat Restrictions May 21, 5:10 p.m.
Changing course, AT&T has decided to allow all users -- including those with unlimited data plans ...
-
Aereokiller Agrees To Change Name May 20, 4:38 p.m.
Aereokiller, embroiled in litigation with the TV networks, is putting at least one legal dispute behind ...
-
Appeals Court Turns Away Twitter's Challenge To Subpoena May 17, 4:55 p.m.
An appellate court in New York has dismissed Twitter's appeal of a ruling requiring it to ...
-
Apple: No 'Direct Evidence' Of Ebook Price-Fixing May 16, 5:10 p.m.
Did Apple conspire with book publishers to end Amazon's $9.99-per-ebook price? That's the question at the ...
-
AT&T Stirs Controversy With Data-Cap Plans May 15, 5 p.m.
AT&T CEO Randall Stephenson reportedly confirmed today that the carrier plans to let content companies pay ...
-
Pandora User Seeks To Revive Privacy Lawsuit May 14, 4:48 p.m.
In 2010, music service Pandora was one of the first companies to partner with Facebook for ...
-
New Bill Legalizes Cell-Phone Unlocking, DVD Ripping May 13, 5:05 p.m.
Consumers could once again have the right to unlock their cell phones, if a new law ...
-
Data-Cap Exemption For ESPN Raises Neutrality Concerns May 10, 6:40 p.m.
The sports network ESPN reportedly is talking with a major wireless carrier about a deal to ...
-
Righthaven Loses Bid To Revive Lawsuits May 9, 6:20 p.m.
Several years ago, attorney Steven Gibson and the publisher of the Las Vegas Review-Journal cooked up ...
-
Appellate Judge Says Google Books Offers 'Enormous' Benefits May 8, 4:59 p.m.
The Authors Guild's odds of winning its long-running lawsuit against Google appear to be dwindling, at ...


I'm not saying Scribd is or isn't guilty of privacy faux pas here, but I completely disagree with Goldman's comment about what people 'obviously' want.
Arguably, plenty of people want to broadcast the documents they are reading - and still more of us find it intriguing to be able to 'follow' what someone else has read.