Chrome -- which now controls 10% of the
browser market worldwide -- will soon only support two open video formats: Google's own WebM format, and another open-source codec named Theora.
But, "How on Earth can Google
get away with dropping support for one popular codec under the guise of 'open' when baked into their browser is Flash, the decidedly un-open plug-in?" asks TechCrunch. "It's a great hypocritical step forward that is just as likely to backfire."
The move,
according to paidContent, likely indicates that "Google has a problem with the royalties being charged by MPEG-LA, the organization that administers the patent pool for H.264 codec."
Meanwhile, while expressing the support for Google's WebM format, Web publishers and video portals say the move hurts everyone in the short term.
"Bottom line: Much
more expensive to build video on the Web, and much worse user experience," Don MacAskill, chief executive of photo- and video-sharing site SmugMug, tweeted on Tuesday -- as noted by CNet. "I want WebM ...
But I need time for hardware penetration to happen."
"The end result, if WebM is widely adopted, would actually be good for the user," according to The Next Web. "Truly open codecs open the door to support from a
massive number of platforms and holds the promise of ending 'not compatible with your browser' messages. But, as the Internet has gone, we've very seldom seen wide adoption of open
standards and the WebM fight has only just begun."
How is Google withholding support of H.264 any worse than the iPad withholding support of Flash? If Google is being a evil, then so is Steve Jobs.