A Practical Definition Of Programmatic TV

Programmatic TV advertising has become a hot topic over the past year, but what does it really mean? The digital advertising players have been developing a programmatic ecosystem for some time, yet they define programmatic in what amounts to a “I’ll know it when I see it” manner. So how might we map such a loosely formed concept to the TV advertising industry?

Why Isn’t TV “Just Like” Online Video?

Before we jump on the programmatic bandwagon, let’s understand how digital and TV advertising fundamentally differ:

Supply vs. Demand

Like any market, advertising follows basic microeconomic principles. In the case of digital ads, the supply of advertising opportunities is essentially unlimited. Even with $50 billion in play, the demand for those opportunities is still bounded; publishers are always looking for buyers, and buyers can typically expect to find whatever audiences they need. TV on the other hand, is a seller’s market, with buyers looking for future commitments and deals amongst its relatively fixed supply of inventory.

Addressability

Traditionally, TV content has been delivered via broadcast, making it impossible to exclusively target or address a specific set of viewers – today, the majority of TV impressions are still delivered this way. Instead of the highly specific impression-level targeting possible with digital advertising, TV audiences are usually indirectly addressed as blocks of impressions, using specific programs or networks as proxies for the actual audiences.

Increasingly, distributors/operators are deploying technologies that allow household targeting within broadcast and on-demand programming, but the scale of impressions available through these mechanisms is still relatively small.

And because of the nature of the technologies and the television ecosystem, TV impressions are difficult to compare with digital impressions.

Measurement Mechanisms

In the digital ecosystem, impressions are measured primarily by tracking pixels fired by each user’s browser or app at the time of delivery. On the other hand, TV audience measurement is tied up in a thicket of legacy business constraints, Congress-mandated privacy restrictions, and technological limitations. As a result, audience size and composition is statistically derived for blocks of impressions at the national and market-level from sampled tuning data, typically provided days after the impressions occurred.

Lead and Lag Times

Programmatic digital advertising is a nearly instant kind of business; load your campaign into Demand-Side Platform (DSP) of your choice, upload the creative to the Content Delivery Network (CDN) of your choice, and wait for comScore or Nielsen to tell you how you’re doing.

Not so for television. The majority of TV impressions are bought months in advance, and every supplier requires a traffic lead time (from hours to days in advance). TV creatives generally must be approved before airing. Occasionally, some measurement data can be made available overnight, but final reporting won’t be available until two or three weeks after airing.

What Is Programmatic TV?

Given these fundamental differences between the TV and digital worlds, programmatic television advertising requires a different definition. For programmatic TV, the definition needs to be pared down. It is the automation of data-driven, audience-based advertising transactions.

When we say automation, this refers to the automation of the end-to-end (advertiser to supplier), round-trip (media planning through affidavit and invoice), transactional workflow. Inventory selection is driven by quantitative data and audience targeting goals, rather than by qualitative spot buying.

You’ll note that the definition above does not use words like “real-time bidding” or “auction.” These are semantics that can be layered on top of programmatic transactions, not the essential ingredients. Auctions are just one means of buyers and sellers agreeing on a price; just as in digital advertising, such pricing also can be fixed via separate negotiations. Likewise, these transactions can be done in real-time or on a reserved/futures basis — to be clear, it is unlikely that any TV advertising will be transacted in real-time due to technological and business reasons.

Where Are We Headed?

TV advertising systems are complicated, balkanized, and extremely busy running a $70 billion business. We won’t get to a true programmatic ecosystem overnight. Instead, we see a staged slither-crawl-walk-run transition playing out over the next several years. The goal of this process will be collaboration within the industry to create standards and increase the chance of success for all players. There will be slow adopters, who fear devaluating their hit show inventory, for example; but over time, we hope the simplicity of automation, plus the immediacy of data, will prevail in uniting the supply-side and demand-side economics of TV.

Buyers and suppliers have been electronically distributing insertion orders and invoices for some time (a precursor to programmatic), but it’s only now that the various ecosystem players have started the arduous process of building workflow automation and developing the predictive audience models needed to translate between buyers’ audience goals and supplier avail inventory. That process must include the adoption of an industry standard suite of application programming interfaces (APIs) that allows buyers’ and sellers’ systems to interact.

Recommend (8) Print RSS
4 comments about "A Practical Definition Of Programmatic TV ".
  1. Ed Papazian from Media Dynamics Inc , August 29, 2014 at 3:10 p.m.
    An interesting piece, Joel. I think that you are going to be a bit disappointed, though, about the time table for full adoption of programmatic for TV planning, buying and selling. As you say, it's true that online selling involves "audience" on an individual basis while TV's version of audience is based on projections from Nielsen's surveys. But, as the latter are regarded as "accurate", this distinction makes little difference. TV advertisers believe that they are buying audience, they just don't know the names and addresses of each "viewer. As for "addressable" TV buys, these are still in their infancy and are faced with the real problem of not knowing who in a home is viewing. Finally, regarding some TV sellers dragging their feet because they want to keep their hands on "hit" show or "premium" GRP inventory, you're implying that most will probably be willing to accept programmatic for their less than premium GRP shows----meaning average or low rated shows. That's not the way things work. Any network, cable channel or station, will opt to retain absolute control over all of its GRPs---except, possibly, those attained well after midnight-----because they often package the high rated entries with the others as a way to sell off everything they have ----or as close to this as possible. Also, in prime time, at least, a network never knows for sure which shows will be hits or misses, which is another complication to consider as it applies to upfront sales. As for the labor saving benefit of automating post buy servicing,, including billings, trafficking of commercials, etc. much of this is now done via some form of computerized procedure, though it's certainly possible that the programmatic folks may be able to add some new and useful wrinkles to improve the process. Anyway, good luck on programmatic taking over TV planning, buying and selling in the next few years-----but please don't hold your breath on that forecast. We don't want to lose you.
  2. Joel Melby from clypd , September 2, 2014 at 10:11 a.m.
    Thanks, Ed, for your kind comments. I appreciate the sage advice; we certainly aren't betting on the TV industry moving to programmatic en masse any time soon. However, we have been very surprised by the building momentum over the past year. IPG's public commitment to programmatic buying and the subsequent Magna Consortium announcement seem to have crystallized latent demand for end-to-end automation (connecting and integrating all the islands of automation that exist across the industry) and audience-based transactions. To Dave Morgan's point (http://www.mediapost.com/publications/article/233145/media-fragmentation-means-ad-worlds-future-based.html?edition=75708), the ongoing fragmentation of TV audiences will only increase the pressure on buyers and sellers to transition a portion of their business to programmatic. Stay tuned!
  3. Seth Ulinski from TBR , September 2, 2014 at 1:24 p.m.
    Great overview, Joel. I think rise of smart TVs combined with OTT devices is setting the stage nicely for programmatic TV. While there might be a complex/ugly infrastructure supporting traditional TV, the same can be said of digital media just a few years ago (still a work in progress). Where programmatic technology can streamline and improve, it will be implemented by forward-thinking CXOs. It doesn't necessarily have to "replace" legacy systems to be relevant, just improve processes and drive efficiencies.
  4. Joel Melby from clypd , September 3, 2014 at 1:59 p.m.
    Seth, we're pretty much on the same page (although I'm less convinced that smart TVs, etc will lead the way, since the MVPD walled gardens still "hold" the vast majority of the eyeballs).