Trouble Viewing?
The question began with a client inquiring about a high percentage of users clicking on the "Trouble Viewing?" link to the online version in a particular e-mail. Clicks on the Trouble link are included in a report showing clicks on all links in the e-mail, which is a problem. First, the report percentages represent link clicks/all clicks. This means an e-mail with a lot of click activity will show a lower percentage of Trouble clicks than a less-popular e-mail (E-mail B below), although the same number of people may have clicked to view the online version.
What measure makes sense? Trouble clicks/Delivered? This denominator includes people who never opened the e-mail in the first place and yields a number too small to be useful. Trouble Clicks/Opens? Since the Open rate is flawed, I try never to use it as the basis for another stat. The Trouble clicks (along with clicks to view the text version) should really be counted as opens. They represent a user clicking to get a readable version. But they're really "super opens" because they are a) more reliable and b) represent a second action (post-open) that indicates a higher level of user engagement.
Despite the name I've chosen, "Trouble," a click on this link is really a good thing. It indicates a user that is getting to the best version of an e-mail--full screen, with images--the one we intended them to see.
This leads to interesting questions and opportunities for e-mail optimization.
Are those who get to the online version by clicking the Trouble link more responsive than those who don't? If so, what gets them to the online version? Will an e-mail designed for preview panes/blocked images deliver better results than the e-mail that reveals nothing and requires a click? Does it depend on (e-mail) brand loyalty? Some split tests are in order! I'd welcome volunteers with other examples of, or comments on this subject.
Good luck!
The E-mail Diva
Send your questions or submit your e-mail for critique to Melinda Krueger, the E-mail Diva, at emaildiva@kd-i.com. All submissions may be published; please indicate if you would like your name or company name withheld.
MELINDA KRUEGER
Melinda Krueger is director of email marketing at OgilvyOne. Contact her at mbkrueger@gmail.com
Recent Email Insider Articles
-
Five Engagement Killers -- And How To Overcome Them May 23, 3:26 p.m.
While we all know that the goal to win and retain engagement extends beyond the inbox ...
-
Once Again, I Double-Dog Dare You! May 20, 11:41 p.m.
In 2008 and 2010, I double-dog dared marketers to experiment with some little-used, out-of-the-box, perhaps even ...
-
The Inattentive Consumer: How To Break Through To Mobile Subscribers May 14, 1 p.m.
As marketers, we have put a strong focus on building mobile programs over the past few ...
-
Mother's Day Hangover May 13, 1:15 p.m.
Post-Mother’s Day, and we made it through. While not quite the holiday retail rush that the ...
-
Parenting Advice For Email Marketers May 9, 3:04 p.m.
For decades, the evolution of email as a viable and proven marketing channel has been, in ...
-
Phishers' Kryptonite: Big Data May 8, 9:29 a.m.
Over the last few years, spam has become a “largely solved” problem. The average consumer sees ...
-
Go Ahead -- Send More Emails May 3, 12:04 a.m.
In fact, send a lot more emails. There, I said it. I feel better now. As ...
-
The Truths Your Email Metrics Don't Reveal May 1, 11:09 a.m.
When you read the latest email statistic as it comes through your news feed each day, ...
-
Email Before Breakfast -- And Other Trends April 29, 1:43 p.m.
I always say, I get more done before 9 a.m. than I do the rest of ...
-
Sending A Welcome Series Is The New Onboarding Differentiator April 23, 3:24 p.m.
The beginning of an email marketing relationship is the most important. Not only are subscribers more ...
Be the first to comment on "Trouble Viewing?"
Leave a Comment