Rubicon Declares Ad Server Dead, Brings On Allen & Company

Eyeing big money and grand ambitions, ad technology firm The Rubicon Project has hired Allen & Company to help finance expansion and possible acquisitions.

Having a little "Jerry Maguire" moment, the ad tool provider issued a "manifesto" on Friday, in which it criticized the current leaders in the ad-server technology market for failing to measure up to its own "publisher-centric" standards.

"The balance in the marketplace today favors the demand-side, which has lead to significant price erosion for publishers," said Frank Addante, CEO and founder of the Rubicon Project. "This erosion threatens the sustainability of the ad-supported digital publishing business."

Although he didn't name names, it is widely understood that Addante is referring to Google's DoubleClick ad platform.

Calling the ad server dead, Addante continued: "Ad-serving technologies currently available to publishers of high-quality digital content are outdated, making it extremely difficult to effectively manage today's sales organizations."

Facing intense competition, Rubicon recently raised an additional $13 million -- of a total $42 million -- in venture funding to fuel various growth initiatives, including strategic acquisitions, research and development, infrastructure and international expansion.

A growing number of startups are competing to help Web publishers better manage ad networks offering to sell their leftover ad impressions.

Apart from DoubleClick, rivals like Pubmatic and AdMeld factor in pricing data, available inventory, and publisher guidelines to determine which ad network is sent an ad impression -- work that a publisher's sales force would otherwise be required to perform.

In an effort to address the broader issue of data fragmentation, The Rubicon Project recently acquired behavioral targeting data provider Others Online. Financial terms of the deal were not disclosed.

"Fragmentation has made it difficult for (advertisers) to efficiently reach their audiences," said Addante, while "the recent growth in the number of data companies in the market has created fragmentation at the data level."

Based in Los Angeles, the Rubicon Project launched in 2007. In the first quarter of 2009, the company reported 150% revenue growth over the fourth quarter of 2008.

The company's publisher clients include Gannett, Salon, Washington Post/Newsweek Interactive and American Greetings.

4 comments about "Rubicon Declares Ad Server Dead, Brings On Allen & Company".
Check to receive email when comments are posted.
  1. Timothy Nichols, February 20, 2010 at 2:37 p.m.

    The Rubicon Project Says Ad Server Is Dead An Receives 6400% More Mentions On Twitter http://bit.ly/d0Pp29

  2. Yali Sassoon from Keplar LLP, February 22, 2010 at 11:03 a.m.

    The Rubicon Project's focus on ad server technology is thought provoking but misplaced. As I describe in http://www.keplarllp.com/blog/2010/02/the-rubicon-project-manifesto-is-not-a-silver-bullet-for-publishers, Publishers will start to enjoy higher CPMs when they work WITH advertisers to deliver advertising that improves the visitor experience rather than detracts from it. That requires creativity and hard work (in terms of forming relationships with advertisers and working with delivering new ad formats). It is not something that can easily be enabled through a third party platform like Rubicon's.

  3. R.J. Lewis from e-Healthcare Solutions, LLC, February 25, 2010 at 8:04 a.m.

    This is sad. Rubicon and exchanges like them are exactly WHY publisher rates are deteriorating so quickly. This appears to be a knee-jerk reaction to Google Doubleclick's Exchange offering - a massive offensive aimed to make Rubicon and companies like it a afterthought.

    Rubicon appears to be a case study in a company whose raised and burned through a ton of cash in perpetual search for a business model.

    Cut your losses and run.

  4. Dean Collins from Cognation Inc, April 24, 2010 at 5:28 p.m.

    @Yali - i have to agree with you. http://www.LiveChatConcepts.com made a decision a long time ago we would only run 1 ad per page and that this ad would be highly visible and obvious (we rotate the ads every 60 seconds).

    Offering an effective marketing "location" is a step in the right direction, selling 18 ads per page is only a step back.

    Cheers,
    Dean Collins
    Founder
    Live Chat Concepts

Next story loading loading..