Commentary
Social Addiction
- by Jack Loechner , Staff Writer @mp_research, May 21, 2010
According to the latest Retrevo Gadgetology study asking social
media users such as when, where, and how much time they spend on sites and services like FaceBook and Twitter, many people appear to be obsessed with checking in with their social media circles
throughout the day and even the night.
Do You Check Facebook or Twitter Before Going to Bed? | ||
Yes, during the night or as soon as I wake up | 48% 52% | |
No, never | ||
Do You Update Facebook or Twitter after going to bed? | ||
| Under Age 25 | Over 25 |
Any time I wake up | 19% | 11% |
Sometimes | 27 | 20 |
As soon as I wake up in the morning | 32 | 21 |
Source: Retrevo, May 2010 | ||
Not only do social media fanatics check Facebook and Twitter throughout the day, almost half of the respondents said
they check in on the social media scene in bed, during the night or as soon as they wake up in the morning. Younger social media users said they tweet by night more than those over 25. 
Do You Check/Update Twitter/Facebook First Thing In The Morning | |||
| Under Age 25 | Over 25 | iPhone Users |
Yes 42% | |||
Before I get out of bed | 18% | 8% | 28% |
Before I turn on TV | 17 | 17 | 26 |
To get morning news | 16 | 15 | 23 |
No 58% | |||
Source: Retrevo, May 2010 | |||
Among social media users, it appears almost half are so involved with FaceBook and Twitter that they check in the first thing in the morning, with 16% of social media users
saying this is how they get their morning "news." iPhone owners stand out in this study as more involved with social media; they use FaceBook and Twitter more often and in more
places.
Social media can be habit forming, concludes the report. 56% of social media users need to check FaceBook at least once a day, and 12% check in every couple of hours.
How Long Can You Go Without Checking In On Facebook? (% of Respondents) | ||
| Under Age 25 | Over 25 |
A couple of hours | 18% | 11% |
A few times a day | 20 | 15 |
At least once a day | 23 | 29 |
A long time | 40 | 46 |
Source: Retrevo, May 2010 | ||
The study asked consumers how they felt about being interrupted at various times and occasions for an electronic message. Over 40% of respondents said they didn't mind being interrupted for a message, 32% said a meal was not off limits while 7% said they'd even check out a message during an intimate moment.
Interruptions Tolerated (% of Respondents) | ||
| Under Age 25 | Over 25 |
During a meeting | 22% | 11% |
During a meal | 49 | 27 |
During sex | 11 | 6 |
On the job | 24 | 12 |
Don't like interruptions | 33 | 62 |
Source: Retrevo, May 2010 | ||
The report concludes by questioning if these early morning users of Facebook or Twitter
may be more addicted than interested. The author posits that it appears that social media may have begun to replace more conventional sources for news with many social media users saying tweets trump
TVs for that "morning cup of news."
For additional information from Retrevo, and about the study, please visit here.
Jack Loechner is the Editor of The Center for Media Research's daily Research Brief. You can reach him at jack@mediapost.com.
Facebook is the new Phillip Morris. Gotta get that fix!
Every year a big snow storm hits Washingto D.C., and the entire Federal Government shuts down. The next day it's as if nothing happened.
If we can survive 24 hours with no lobbyists, we should certainly be able to survive a few hours with no Facebook -- unless, of course, someone has an important weather update.
As more and more people begin to use smartphones, these numbers will likely climb.
Regarding the chart about interruptions, is it interruptions caused by the respondent's device or interruptions created by others' devices? It would be interesting to see if there is a difference between the two situations.
http://www.HistoryAsYouExperiencedIt.com
So sad. I was going to head outside for a workout, but saw this headline and had to stop, read the poll, then post it to Twitter. And while I'm on Twitter, maybe I'll just check my mentions, or a link to that other interesting article that someone just tweeted, and then...
Sex must not be as good today as it used to be when I was young judging by the % of people who wouldn't mind a Facebook interruption. Geez!
Egad, all these "do you" questions! No wonder I have trouble getting my research methods students to unlearn the bad habits promoted by so-called researchers who don't know how to write survey questions.
When you ask people yes/no questions, you effectively squash all subtlety that might lead to better understanding. Thus, someone who means "absolutely yes" is lumped with someone who means "yes, I guess, maybe" and someone who means "no never" is lumped in with someone who means "hardly ever, sometimes but rarely, so I'll say 'no'"!
Would it be so hard to demand that all surveys ask "How often do you" rather than "Do you"? Maybe a Federal law is needed [sarcasm].
I'm with Douglas Ferguson above. Not only is the methodology here questionable, but extrapolating the behavior to 'addiction' is irresponsible. To suggest that the participants are more 'addicted' than interested may get headlines but it is attribution on the part of the authors, not science. Further, an addiction is a medical diagnosis determined by a series of criteria, not one of which is included in the questions asked. Nor do the authors make any distinction as to context of the messages or senders. The only valid conclusions from this study is that people have adjusted their communication habits to take advantage of the new tools available and that compared to older means of communications, it's easier to be more frequently in touch using these. For a marketer, it is good information about how to reach an audience. For a social scientist, it falls seriously short.