point-of-view

Commentary

Who Should Own Social Media?

 

When part of my garden fence fell down this week, my dog was delighted, my neighbor exposed, my wife mortified and my impatiens completely flattened. After spending a couple of hours jerry-rigging the crumbling wood back into place, I realized this experience was a convenient if not appropriate metaphor for the challenge marketers face in dealing with social media within their organizations.

Like a dog with a bone, consumers are thrilled with the tumbling divide between themselves and the brands they choose to engage with. Unfortunately, big companies do not necessarily share this enthusiasm, treating social media as yet another channel to be managed by an existing department like marketing or corporate communications and, in doing so, limiting the opportunity for a truly new approach.

In fact, in a recent poll conducted by The CMO Club, a whopping 62% of CMOs said their department leads social media. Added one of the polled CMOs, "Social networks are about engaging customers ands stakeholders so Marketing has that responsibility." Pete Krainik, founder of The CMO Club, explained that, "marketing departments have a more strategic view of the business, customer trends and upcoming programs," and therefore should be leading social media initiatives.

advertisement

advertisement

/Chart-C 

In this same survey, CMOs acknowledged that just more than 1 in 5 companies have PR/Corporate Communications leading social media. But this may be a vestige of the early days of social media. Explained one of the polled CMOs, "Responsibility started in PR/Corporate Communications but we quickly moved it to the Marketing department as community marketing became more and more important to us." (Hmm, can't help but think a Corp Comm head might see these as "fighting words.")

And despite the fact that social media is a fence-busting hydra touching just about every aspect of a company's business, only 11% of the CMOs surveyed said that social media was led by a cross-functional team. When I asked Catherine Davis, the former CMO of Diageo, about this, she explained, "Cross-department collaboration can be quite complicated, particularly with new disciplines like social media."

Complicated or not, Josh Karpf, senior manager of digital media communications at PepsiCo, professed that "everyone has a role, marketing, communications, HR and you need a variety of skill sets from customer service to insights to editorial strategy." Added Karpf, "You likely won't be able to find all those experts in one function within a company." So, while Robert Frost's proverb "good fences make good neighbors" may be true in real life, it is not necessarily the ideal approach to dealing with social media.

Like my mortified wife, companies are less than thrilled by the collapsing fences between brand and consumer, and many are jerry-rigging solutions while they figure out a long-term plan. Noted Dan Greenfield of Bernaise Source Consulting, "PR and marketing pros seem a little conflicted; few deny the value of integrating sales, customer service and community moderation teams when building a modern-day engagement strategy but most lack a clear sense of how to do it." (Greenfield will be addressing this challenge head-on at the upcoming PR+MKTG Camp.)

And while there is little hope of recovery for my flattened impatiens, a flattened organizational structure may be just the trick for companies seeking to truly engage with consumers via social media. PepsiCo's Karpf instructed, "It's really about process and clearly defined roles, so the trick is finding the right team and a cohesiveness that allows the process to move forward." Confirmed CMO Davis, "I have always found it helpful to establish joint objectives with clearly defined roles and responsibilities."

Instead of plopping social media into a pre-existing department structure, this author can't help but wonder why more companies aren't trying a new and highly collaborative approach. Despite the inherent challenges of cross-departmental collaboration, if ever there were a time to try something new, this would be it. Social media simply touches too many disciplines from customer service to PR, human resources to marketing, recruiting to sales, to rationalize keeping the old departmental fences in place.

5 comments about "Who Should Own Social Media? ".
Check to receive email when comments are posted.
  1. Steve Schildwachter from Enterprise CMO, LLC, October 5, 2010 at 9:24 a.m.

    Great post, Drew!
    Maybe the question should be "Who PROVIDES Social Media?"
    http://admajoremblog.blogspot.com/2009/10/who-provides-social-media.html

  2. Karen Ticktin from brandthis, October 5, 2010 at 3:26 p.m.

    From where we sit, the consumer owns the conversation and the brand asks to be invited in. Social media is not a budget line item or new vehicle through which to push out MARCOM messages but rather a strategic decision to engage in an on-going two way dialogue with consumers. So unless the conversation truly resonates and provides value to the all powerful consumer, really doesn't matter which chamber of the ivory tower social media resides.

  3. Jamie Gorman, October 5, 2010 at 4:05 p.m.

    The big companies that I see wasting an opportunity are banks! By holding social media hostage at the corporate level they are denying branch managers an excellent tool to become a "community bank". One branch manager I know from BB&T is great at networking and using community events to market her branch - having her own Facebook page for the branch would be an awesome tool. So the ownership should definitely extend to the people who need to actually establish the relationship with customers!
    Thanks for the great post.

  4. Ronnie Perchik from PromoAid, LLC, October 5, 2010 at 6:03 p.m.

    Great post. Isn't this the "square peg, round hole" syndrom? Regardless of where the ownership of social media resides, it needs to be staffed by people who understand how to execute and led by someone who can use its power. New media leaves marketers uncomfortable, because until they understand its staying power, they want to owe it...which is just plan old internal politics.

    Social media can't be owned by one department, because it can cross everything the company does. So just like in the late 90's when every company and every brand was creating a website, even though they didn't understand how or what to use it for, we may have to let Social media further evolve and then determine the best home.

  5. Drew Neisser from Renegade, October 6, 2010 at 2:24 p.m.

    Thanks for all the feedback:
    Ronnie-i think a lot of companies are parking in one place on a temporary basis as they see how it shakes out.
    Jamie-your branch manager at BBT may have her hands tied by corporate because of FINRA regulations which require separation of personal/professional communications among other things.
    Karen-marketers by definition want to "market" thus the conundrum with social media.
    Steve-thanks for the link.

Next story loading loading..