Commentary

What's the Frequency, Kenneth?

As the push for incorporating traditional metrics such as reach and frequency into the planning process continues to gain steam, I once again find myself asking the old question of what is an effective frequency for creating a reaction in online advertising?

The obvious answer, and sort of a cop-out response, is ‘it depends.’

The effective frequency level for different audiences to create different reactions can certainly vary and there are a number of factors that weigh into the discussion. Here are some of my opinions of what you need to consider when determining what the effective frequency should be for your campaigns:

  • Brand Awareness: An established brand always requires a lower frequency level in order to convey a message clearly and have an impact on the audience. This means that your initial product launch may require much more ubiquitous advertising and a higher frequency until the audience has built some recognition from your campaign.

  • Clutter and Clarity: If your message is simple and to the point, it will always stand out better amidst the clutter of the advertising world. If your message has to battle for mindshare, the audience has to expend too much energy digesting it and will probably not have enough left over to be considered effective. If your message requires more mindshare to sink in, then you need a higher frequency.

    advertisement

    advertisement

  • Contextual Relevancy: If your message is received within a contextually relevant placement, where the user is considering this type of a product or service, then your message will be more effective and will require a lower frequency.

  • Level of Informed Purchase Decision: If the product or service you are advertising is an impulse level purchase, then the frequency required may be less. For example, a book or CD may require a lower frequency than a car or auto insurance, as these are higher on the needs of the user and require more information and a much more informed purchase decision. For these types of products and services, a higher frequency is required to keep your brand top-of-mind.

  • Uniqueness of Product/Service: If your campaign is advertising a truly unique product, then frequency may not be as necessary as your competition is certainly going to be minimal and your message may stand out as well.

  • Size of Primary Ad Units: One factor that is sometimes overlooked is the size of the primary unit for the campaign. Of course this is related to the clutter issue, but the simple fact is that if you are running prestitial type units rather than banner units, the required frequency will be lower because you have a more impactful unit to work with.

    Flighting is also an element that needs to be considered when discussing frequency in your campaign. Ubiquity surrounding a product launch is certainly one strategy that requires a much higher frequency over a shorter period and can be followed up with a continuity campaign that keeps the brand top-of-mind, but may not be required for the “long-haul.”

    The bottom line in all of this seems to be that the traditional understanding of what is a “desired” reach and frequency may not be applicable yet in the online space simply for the fact that the medium is more dynamic and our industry has not achieved its stability yet. As the audience continues to grow, the established metrics for what is to be considered “the norm” are going to continue to change. In traditional advertising, the accepted norm is around 3-4x frequency. In previous studies, the online desired frequency levels were stated to be 5-6 times. I feel that these numbers are a nice starting point, but the tools at our disposal that are offered by the various third-party adservers and the research companies are what need to be used to perform this analysis on a category-by-category level .

  • Next story loading loading..