Ad Formats by Online Ad Awareness | ||
Format | Size | Delta % Impacted (Avg. +3.0) |
Rectangle | 180x150 | 4.6 |
Half banner | 234x60 | 4.4 |
Medium rectangle | 300x250 | 2.7 |
Large rectangle | 336x280 | 2.3 |
Wide skyscraper | 160x600 | 2.0 |
Leaderboard | 728x90 | 1.9 |
Skyscraper | 120x600 | 1.9 |
Half page ad | 300x600 | 1.8 |
Full banner | 486x60 | 1.6 |
Button | 120x90 | - 0.6 |
Source: Dynamic Logic MarketNorms, Q1 2009 (N=3,806,527, Delta= Exposed control) |
Ken Mallon, Dynamic Logic's SVP of Custom Solutions, commented: "We continue to believe that creative quality is the most important factor driving the success of online advertising... (but) based on the current data, bigger doesn't always mean better, but these new ad formats are quite unique..."
The research also revealed that ad campaigns using Rich Media with Video created the strongest brand impact (across most branding goals, including aided brand awareness, online ad awareness, brand favorability, and purchase intent) compared to campaigns using Simple Flash and Rich Media without Video formats. The worst performer was Simple Flash, the format used most often by agencies and advertisers, notes the report.
Change in Brand Impact by Type of Format (% Delta vs. Fixed Frequency Level=1) | |||
| Delta Performance by Ad Format(* = No Significant Effect) | ||
Brand Measurement | Rich media with video | Rich Media without Video | Simple Flash |
Aided brand awareness | 1.9 | 0.9 | 0.4 |
Onlline ad awareness | 2.6 | 2.1 | 2.2 |
Message association | * | 0.7 | 1.0 |
Brand favorability | 2.3 | 0.5 | * |
Purchase intent | 1.2 | 0.5 | * |
Source: Dynamic Logic MarketNorms, July 2009 (Numbers are % impact change vs. exposed control) |
Mallon concludes that "...strategy and consideration of branding goals is often an after-thought in decisions about creative format... "
Included in the report, Dynamic Logic offers some guidelines for advertisers and agencies based on the findings:
The Report states that the results cited have not been adjusted for exposure frequency, demographics, ad size, Web sites, advertiser industry and other factors that may contribute to brand lift. These findings are aggregate in nature, reflect past results and are not a guarantee of future results for individual campaigns.
For additional information and details about the study, please go here.
Excellent insights into ad effectiveness. Thanks for publishing.
Insightful, but surely the positioning of the ad format relative to the page design and lay-out will have significant impact on effectiveness. Moreso, if the ad is placed within close proximity to the content or utility the page is being visited for, irrespective of relative size, the ad will perform beter.
I believe a half page ad within the content or in close proximity will outperform a rectangle (given the same messaging, design, call to action and incentive), which would suggest bigger ads do realize improved results relative to their positioning on the page.