That's Entertainment: Screen Size Doesn't Matter

• Comment (2)
• Recommend (11)
• Tweet
• 

When it comes to watching entertainment programming, it turns out size doesn’t matter as much as people previously thought (or hoped).

According to a new study conducted by Chadwick Martin Bailey (CMB), consumers are using their tablets and smartphones to stream video programming at an increasing rate, and they’re doing it in their homes, where televisions are available. According to the survey of nearly 1,500 consumers, 58% of people who viewed programming on a tablet did so in their homes -- and of these, 63% did so even though the program they were watching was available on their televisions.

“The big media companies have been comforted in this notion that the biggest available screen is always going to win in any situation,” Peter Fondulas, founder of Fondulas Strategic Research, which worked on the project with CMB, tells Marketing Daily. “That may have been true a while ago, but people have become more open to devices and may even prefer [smaller screens] in some situations.”

The survey found significant members of all demographics have watched video programming through a device other than their televisions. While 74% of consumers ages 16-29 had watched programming online, 39% of consumers 50-75 had also watched a television program or movie online. And their preferred method of watching such programming is either through a network Web site (27%) or Netflix (24%). Only 12% of consumers said they watched through their TV provider’s Web portal (such as Comcast’s Xfinity.com).

Such findings could have serious repercussions as the cable and satellite industries work to continue their business models in the new era of Internet-connected television. According to the study, 43% of consumers said they’re likely to cut back on cable spending in the next year.

However, the companies’ greatest fear (consumers cutting the cord entirely and opting for an Internet-only model) is less likely. Only 3% said they’d cut their cable entirely. More likely, consumers will be looking to “shave” services, such as cutting premium and non-premium channels, removing HD boxes and cutting down the number of boxes in their houses.

“The people that we see shaving their pay TV service are in essence creating their own a la carte plan,” Jon Giegengack, a director at CMB, tells Marketing Daily. “My own hunch is that pay TV will have to switch to a model more like that. as there’s more attrition.”

With the inevitability that more people will look to the Internet to watch television and movie programming (particularly with more Internet-connected televisions in the home), the opportunity is wide open for a company to come in with a different model that appeals to consumers’ individual tastes, Giegengack says.

“One of the barriers we found [to cord shaving] was the ambiguity of what the options are and the services [consumers] have,” he says. “There’s this increasing group of people who are on deck and know that there are better of options available, but haven’t yet cut the service.”

The company that does succeed will likely have to be strong on the three fronts that consumers said were important to them: streamable content (as opposed to owned content), a wide variety of programming available and, most of all, ease of use. “Lots of companies are working hard at this, and it’s only a matter of time before someone does,” Fondulas says.

• Comment (2)
• Recommend (11)
• Tweet
• 

2 comments on "That's Entertainment: Screen Size Doesn't Matter".

1. Douglas Ferguson from College of Charleston
   

   commented on: February 15, 2012 at 9:09 a.m.
   It's not screen size as much as the ratio of screen size to viewing distance. Yes, the screen in your living room is much, much larger than your iPad, but your eyeballs when viewing are much, much farther away from your big screen than your handheld screen. Next time you're watching TV on that monstrous home screen, hold up your tablet screen at half-arm's length and compare the relative size to the wall-mounted behemoth. More often than not, there's no perceptible difference! I'll admit a cell phone is probably too small (and no one wants to hold their phone too close to one's face to make up the difference), but the 10-inch tablet is just big enough to be quite comparable to viewing a screen across the room. Not so sure about the 8-inch Kindle, but I find my iPad a very reasonable alternative to watching a show that someone else in my home is watching on the big TV.
2. Shawn Anderson from PromaxBDA
   

   commented on: February 16, 2012 at 3:51 p.m.
   Were the 1,500 participants a true mix of the viewing audience? How long did they watch on a hand held device? How many hours per week? Also, in regards to smart TVs how many are currently in the market and how many consumers plan to move towards these sets in the next 12-36 months? With the HD shift it has been my understanding consumers plan on keeping those sets for years, so the move to a smart TV may be more like 3-5 years or more away. I think we saw with Blu-Ray and now 3D the consumer is maxed out on purchasing new technology. It would seem to me the cable provider who can truly be the content portal is in a better position to succeed and ensure the consumer maintains a link to their services and might possibly willing to pay more for the connectivity. There are also so many issues with moving to an a la carte model for both the content providers and distributers. It all comes down to valuation and advertising and how can media be delivered to the consumer while still ensuring there is a profit.

Leave a Comment