advertisement
advertisement
For instance (in non-hierarchical order):
1) Multiple ownership of TV stations in the same market
2) National television station ownership (single market and multiple)
3) Dual broadcast network ownership
4) Broadcast/ newspaper/ radio cross-ownership
5) V-chip utilization/ parental controls for TV
6) Radio station group ownership (single market and multiple)
7) Cable systems operators' ownership of programming on their systems
8) Cable systems operators and broadcast stations' cross-ownership
9) Cable systems operators' penetration of national viewership
10) Cable subscription fees
11) Satellite operators' ownership of programming on their system
12) Satellite operators and broadcast stations' cross-ownership
13) Satellite subscription fees
14) Satellite/ cable/ broadcast cross-ownership
15) Telco/ cable/ satellite cross-ownership
16) Net neutrality
17) Enforcing cable card deployment
18) Must carry broadcast transmissions for all digital terrestrial channels
19) Program availability via fair and equitable licensing arrangements
20) The sanctity of copyright
21) The efficacy of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act
So when I read that the Senate Commerce Committee has approved legislation asking the FCC to oversee the development of a "Super V-chip" that would screen content on cell phones and the Internet -- does everyone remember how study after reported study denounced the waste of time, money and efficacy of the TV V-chip debacle - coupled with the FCC's laser-like focus on defining indecency as it relates to TV programming, I'm thinking one thought. I get how a small device like a V-Chip fits inside a big TV set. But how will something as monstrous as a Super V-Chip be crammed inside something as small as a cell phone, or the possible implications of it clogging my broadband pipe.