New CA Privacy Legislation Won't Hurt Direct Marketers
"We're not opposed to any of them," says the DMA's vice president of government relations Jim Conway. "They're in line with federal law and the DMA's positions."
The first measure, AB 2944, bans unwanted ads over fax machines. Last year, the governor signed legislation that requires junk faxers to provide a toll-free opt out number, but this measure goes farther. Conway goes along with it because "faxes incur costs for consumers, and if you don't have consent or established business relationships you don't send faxes. If the consumer wants to hear from you, then you should send it. This bill codifies federal law and is consistent with our positions."
The second bill, AB 1769, prohibits unwanted and unsolicited text messages on cell phones and pagers. This form of advertising is new and the bill intends to curtail it before it becomes pervasive, "like spam email has," according to the governor. Conway says he favors the bill much like the first one because consumers incur costs with cell phones when they receive unsolicited messages. "Because of the cost incursion, we try to get members not to do it, it's in line with our guidelines," he says.
The third bill concerns telemarketing, something the DMA supports. But the bill is actually beneficial to telemarketers because it reduces the costs small businesses pay for do-not-call lists. This bill is a follow up to last year's no-call registry, which required businesses to participate. They do so by paying a fee for a do-not-call list. Conway says 27 states now have do-not-call lists and almost all charge a fee for them. The fees pay for the preparation of the lists, which "isn't cheap because you have to update them and there's millions of names," he says. Conway says the DMA has problems with other state restrictions on telemarketing in California, but not this one.
Recent Online Media Daily Articles
-
Network Advertising Initiative Proposes New Mobile Privacy Rules May 22, 9:03 p.m.
Moving forward with its plan to issue mobile privacy rules, the self-regulatory group Network Advertising Initiative ... -
Entertainment, Travel Bet On Mobile Banners May 22, 4:16 p.m.
Banner ads have long been the whipping boy of online advertising, and the same is now ... -
Marketers Should Tailor Specific Pitches To Tablet, Smartphone May 22, 2:51 p.m.
Don’t lump tablets in with mobile. That’s the takeaway of a new Forrester study looking at ... -
Good TV Content Trumps On, Whether Trad TV Or Streaming May 22, 2:42 p.m.
While consumers continue to perceive TV programming as superior in quality to that of online fare, ... -
Google Releases Self-Serve Display Benchmark Tool May 22, 2:02 p.m.
Understanding how a brand's online campaign competes with competitors requires trending benchmark data like engagement rates ... -
Twitter Brings Lead Generation To Tweets May 22, 1:14 p.m.
Twitter began testing a lead generation tool Wednesday in its tweet stream that resembles a cross ... -
DigitasLBi, Razorfish Tap Execs For Global Ops May 22, 11:26 a.m.
Publicis Groupe digital agencies DigitasLBi and Razorfish have installed new executives to run their respective international ... -
More Consumers Turn To Mobile To Research, Book Travel May 22, 8:53 a.m.
More than half of consumers used a mobile device to book travel in the last 90 ... -
Showrooming Overhyped, Mobile Key To Shopping Purchases May 22, 8:53 a.m.
Given consumers' mobile in-store shopping trends, some consider the showrooming hoopla overblown. The research process still ... -
Shopping App Swirl Adds In-Store Capability May 22, 8:53 a.m.
Swirl entered the mobile shopping fray last year with an iPhone app allowing users to learn ...


Be the first to comment on "New CA Privacy Legislation Won't Hurt Direct Marketers"
Leave a Comment