Commentary
Google Me Would Give Advertisers Tons Of Social Signals
- by Laurie Sullivan , Staff Writer @lauriesullivan, July 1, 2010
Buzz, a technology playground for Google engineers to test social services with Gmail users, could in fact become the launch pad for Google Me, a speculative social network under development at Google, a rumor that Digg's Kevin Rose says is from a "pretty credible source."
If that Google Me rumor is true it could create a variety of social signals that would send any advertiser into nirvana. I doubt Google engineers think Facebook members would abandon the social network, so it would have to create a connecting technology that lets the two platforms coexist and members communicate across platforms.
"The problem with anything social Google does is Google users don't arrive at Google to be social," says aimClear Founder Marty Weintraub. Google can test what it likes. "We doubt that Facebook is threatened."
People learned to search with Google tools, not socialize, Weintraub says, calling Facebook the "best social tool on earth," in part, because of an "outstanding construct."
A social network would provide Google with many more signals to target ads. Aaron Goldman, principal at Connectual, brings up a good point. Take Buzz out of Gmail and build on the platform, so more people can access the social services to create for advertisers more "relevant" signals that would not only "improve search algorithms," but the way marketers design campaigns and target ads to consumers.
More signals: scary for consumers; great for advertisers. Don't think for a moment that Google lost sight of its core service.
Google needs a way to connect the social graph to Web site authority and Google Me could be its ticket, Goldman says. He reminds me that Facebook gathers tons of "powerful information about the authority and the utility of Web pages with each punch of the 'like' button." A social network would allow Google to map search with social graph data to understand consumer interests by audience segment. "Likes" could become more important than links for ranking search results because Facebook bases the concept on everyday people, not Web masters.
The plumbing of the Internet will become social, according to a Facebook spokesperson. Facebook continues to build that platform to connect the world through its open graph, instant personalization and social plug-ins. Some platforms are aimed at helping developers, while others are meant to connect partners such as Yelp, Microsoft Docs, and Pandora, making it easier for members to share information.
Search surfacing Open Graph-enabled pages is not completely new for Facebook. Since the announcement in April at f8, the Open Graph-enabled Web pages that you and friends like serve up in search results because these Web pages function as Facebook Pages.
While Facebook plans on continuing to test features, right now, search is not the focus of the team working on the product. The company continues to focus on discovery and enabling users to build out their profile by liking things around the Web.
Laurie Sullivan is a writer and editor for MediaPost. You can reach Laurie at lauriesullivan@gmail.com.
Interesting development in social media. With everything integrated, advertisers can get more insights into what is working and what is not by looking at the how many 'likes' a product or a page gets.
In fact, this is very effective in defining page ranking in google search as it is based on the user response, not just on the page optimizations. Apparently, the google is only perfecting its core business, search engine.
Insightful article, indeed.
I'm not convinced that punching the 'like' button gets anybody anywhere. A one-click 'Boo-yah' or 'You go!' or 'lol' is not equivalent to a vote of confidence, an intention to purchase, or anything else marketers would validate, beyond proof of a stimulus-response. People 'like' each others' baby pictures. People 'like' the fact that someone got his beard shaved and posted a picture. People 'like' quotes from Kim Jong Il with snarky commentary. And people 'like' fried chicken. This is what? Science?
What would be FAR more interesting for Google to do -- and far more useful, and far better for consumers -- is to create a facility whereby people could deliberately create and engage through and edit a toplevel page that organizes access to everything that can be found on the web by or about them. It would give people _themselves_ the opportunity to filter what raw searches don't, and create a de-facto 'public face' for everyone.