Google Holds Right Cards For 'Horizontal' Market

Functionality builds up, then across. That was the principle of emerging markets that I talked about in last week’s column. Up -- then across -- breaking down siloes into a more open, competitive and transparent market. I’ll come back here in a moment.

I've also talked about how Google + might be defining a new way of thinking about social networking, one free of dependence on destinations. It could create a social lens through which all our online activity passes through, adding functionality and enriching information.

Finally, this week, I read that Google is pushing hard to extend Android as the default operating system in the Open Automotive Alliance, turning cars into really big mobile devices. This builds on Android’s dominance in the smartphone market (with an 82% market share).

See a theme here?

For years, I’ve been talking about the day when search transitions from being a destination to a utility, powering apps that provide very specific functionality far outstripping anything you could do on a “one size fits all” search portal. This was a good news/bad news scenario for Google, which was the obvious choice to provide this search grid.

But, in doing so, the company lost its sole right to monetize search traffic, a serious challenge to its primary income source. However, if you piggyback that search functionality onto the de facto operating system that powers all those apps, and then add a highly functional social graph, you have all the makings of a foundation that will support the "horizontalization” of the mobile connected market. Put this in place, and revenue opportunities will begin falling into your lap.

The writing is plainly on the wall here. The future is all about mobile connections. It is the foundation of the Web of Things, wearable technology, mobile commerce -- anything and everything we see coming down the pipe.  The stakes are massive. And, as markets turn horizontal in the inevitable maturation phase to come, Google seems to be well on its way to creating the required foundations for that market.

Let’s spend a little time looking at how powerful this position might be for Google. Microsoft is still coasting on its success in creating a foundation for the desktop, 30 years later.  The fact that it still exists at all is testament to the power of Windows. But the desktop expansion that happened relied on just one device: the PC. And, the adoption curve for the PC took two decades to materialize, due to two things: the prerequisite of a fairly hefty investment in hardware, and a relatively steep learning curve.

The mobile adoption curve, already the fastest in history, has no such hurdles to clear. Relative entry price points are a fraction of what was required for PCs. Also, the learning curve is minimal. Mobile connectivity will leave the adoption curve of PCs in the dust.

In addition, an explosion of connected devices will propel the spread of mobile connectivity. This is not just about smartphones. Two of the biggest disruptive waves in the next 10 years will be wearable technologies and the Web of Things. Both of these will rely on the same foundations, an open and standardized operating system and the ability to access and share data. At the user interface level, the enhancements of powerful search technologies and social-graph enabled filters will significantly improve the functionality of these devices as they interface with the cloud.

In the hand that will inevitably have to be played, it seems Google is currently holding all the right cards.

Tags: google, mobile, search
Recommend (3)
2 comments about "Google Holds Right Cards For 'Horizontal' Market".
  1. William Meisel from TMA Associates , January 9, 2014 at 11:55 a.m.
    One could ask who could challenge Google. Apple is likely to remain in its own silo of Apple-branded products, perhaps profitably, but not a challenge to Google's approach of being everywhere, including Apple products. Microsoft is the wild card. By getting into the mobile race at a point where smartphones could support a more complex OS, they have the same OS for mobile devices and PCs. They also are the leader in productivity software, where mobile devices have been weak and a position in enterprises that Google doesn't have. If horizontal spread is the objective, don't count out Microsoft.
  2. Paula Lynn from Who Else Unlimited , January 9, 2014 at 1:27 p.m.
    Is anyone glad they can be controlled with devices ? Who do you want to trust that control ? What can you do to stop it if you choose ? Will there be alternatives ? Will the alternatives be worse or better ? Who controls them ? People are not looking a few years in advance. We are looking at this as this is cool. Just as much as choices of what you see and choose are going be chosen for you, you will not be able to obtain what you do want (in case you do) because it is not available to you. There are consequences and we are not going to like them without a DO NOT TRACK.