The creeping pace of the Gannett-Google federal lawsuit has been accelerated – slightly. Google, noting that it is “required to answer the federal law allegations that have survived a motion to dismiss,” filed a lengthy answer last week.
In general, Google denies the claims asserted in
Gannett’s June 2023 anti-trust complaint, arguing that “Ad tech (the technology that powers digital advertising on publishers’ sites) is an important part of a healthy
web.”
The answer drills down to state that Google’s actions constitute “bona fide competitive activity,” that Gannett fails to allege harm to
competition or consumers.
Google adds that the “relief sought by Gannett would be contrary to the public interest, harm consumers and businesses, and is
otherwise inequitable, impracticable and unworkable.”
advertisement
advertisement
Gannett's 2023 suit charges that Google maintains a digital advertising monopoly.
Google’s arguments – and the March 1 order by U.S. District Judge P. Kevin Castel – address the federal lawsuit, not actions in state
courts.
Castel wrote, “The motion to dismiss…is GRANTED as to Gannett’s claims premised on exchange bidding, the encryption of user IDs and
line-item capping,” Castel wrote. “It is also GRANTED as to the leveraging claim directed to AMP. The motion is otherwise DENIED.”
Google is seeking
attorney’s fees.
The case is on file with the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York.