I started to write to MediaPost once before (when you included a summary and link to a "news article" from the Think Progress blog) and decided against it, but this time I have to speak out. I would be interested in why you think that the following "article" has any relevance to the use of the Net in media?
This article is pure agenda-driven drivel. What is the point--that The New York Times has a conservative bias? Ridiculous. And having it included in a business-oriented newsletter is disappointing. Even more disappointing than your decision to include the article at all, though, is your decision to substitute polarizing rhetoric like "right-wingers" instead of the term "Republicans" that was actually used in the article. I get it--you are a dyed-in-the-wool liberal. You get your news from Think Progress,Editor & Publisher, the HuffingtonPost and the Daily Kos. I'm sure that working in the media space, you expect that ALL people in marketing are liberals. Well, we aren't... and we don't appreciate having liberal propaganda showing up in our Inboxes disguised as something relevant to our industry. Please refrain from including this type of information in future updates. Thank you.
advertisement
advertisement