There's been lots of chatter across the Interwebs about Google Instant over the past couple weeks.
Two of my fellow Search Insiders took
the bait, with Todd Friesen declaring "Google Instantly Annoying" and Rob Garner penning
"Steve Rubel Backpedals On Death Of SEO Post."
Here are 10 storylines I'm
expecting to see in the coming months as a result of Google Instant:
1. FarmVille Sees Record Growth. According to Google,
"Before Google Instant, the typical searcher took more than 9 seconds to enter a search term, and we saw many examples of searches that took 30-90 seconds to type." Now if my mom is the
typical searcher, then I'll buy that.
While it may not be "2-5 seconds per search," there's surely some element of time savings here and all those milliseconds will add
up. (There is an element, and don't call me Shirley!) Google says it will save searchers 350 million hours each year. As for what people will do with all that extra time, my guess is we're
going to see some bumper crops!
2. Google Implicated in Teen Suicide. John Smith was having a bad day. His friends had been
teasing him incessantly about his stutter and he couldn't take it anymore.So he turned to Google for creative ways to get back at them. He was so mad he even considering killing
them.
Following his whim, John began to Google "Best way to kill your" and then he paused. Was it friends? Classmates? Bullies? Too late. After a few nanoseconds Google
predicted his query, "How to kill your self." Sure enough, the results popped up and John popped himself.
An extreme and unlikely scenario, I know, but the potential for Google
Instant to create self-fulfilling prophecies is very real.
3. Bing Surpasses 15% Market Share. If, like Todd, people find
Instant annoying, will they just turn it off or go so far as to kick the Google Habit completely?
And, if it's the latter, what's a 4-letter word for "almost as good as Google"?
4. Screwy Quality Scores Mystify
Advertisers. Google has gone to great lengths to reassure us that Instant will not impact Quality Score, but I find that hard to believe. Google has acknowledged that impression counts
will vary with Instant -- but that the Quality Score algorithm will account for this fluctuation
OK, I'll buy that. But what about click rate? Surely, with the searcher's eyes darting
all over the page as the query is typed, certain ads are more likely to stand out, while others are more likely to be ignored. The impact will be different for each advertiser, and each ad, but there
will certainly be an impact.
5. Fewer Search Marketers Rely on Long-Tail Keywords. As Todd pointed out in his column, fewer
Google searchers will continue their query all the way down the long tail. Rather, they'll see the result(s) they're looking for and make a pre-emptive click. And, as Bryant Garvin noted in
the comments on Todd's column, Instant is likely to cut down on the "25% of queries each day that Google has never seen before." (My sources tell me this number is closer to 20%,
but the point stands.)
This changes the imperative for search marketers to build out extensive lists of long-tail keywords for Google and, instead, focus on creative optimization as a means to
pick off those pre-emptive clickers and offset the higher costs of going after head terms. This also forces marketers to rethink target terms for SEO.
6.
CPC Rates Rise Across All Advertiser Categories. With fewer queries making their way down the long tail, competition for head terms will heat up, thus driving up bid
prices. 'Nuff said here.
7. Online Retailers See Conversion Rates Decrease. I suspect Instant will lead to a lot of "false
clicks." That is, erroneous clicks that result from a searcher trying to click a listing that was "right there just a second ago."
Additionally, I see Google Instant
interrupting a lot of searchers who had been focused on completing a task (like booking a plane ticket), and instead get sidetracked by a suggested Google result that's tangentially related to the
task. This will lead to a lot more "browsing," as searchers are interested in seeing related topics and content but are not in "buy mode" for them.
8. Google Bows More Image Ad Formats. On an instantly changing results page, product listing and other image ads will jump off the
page. Google will see the spikes in click rates for image ads and be tempted to introduce more formats that are similar. Advertisers will buy them like hotcakes as they, too, will see increased click
rates and even (gasp!) branding opportunities on search results pages. This will drive up prices and further reinforce Google's motivations to deliver more image ads.
9. Google Stock Price Rises North of $600. All this extra clicking and advertiser bidding will improve Google's revenue and
margin from search ads -- and finally, give investors confidence that Google can find new ways to monetize its bread-and-butter product.
It's also worth pointing out that a reduction in
long-tail queries will help Google with monetization, since fewer queries will go without (lots of) relevant advertisers.
10. Google Turns Off Instant as
Search Default. Despite the increased revenue, I suspect consumer backlash will be so severe that Google will stop defaulting to Instant. As discussed in chapter 3 of my book, one of the reasons Google became so popular was how easy it was to use. Google's simple homepage, with lush white spaces and orderly results pages
featuring pristine rows of blue links, created a very simple and intuitive user experience.
Now, the Google homepage has crazy doodles (and, for some people, background images and/or
gadgets), and the results page is full of refinements and images, all of which are assembling and reassembling on the fly as you type. It's too much. Maybe not for me, but definitely for my
mother. And, trust me, before tending to her crop 24/7, she used to do a lot of Googling.