The Federal Communications Commission this week moved forward with its open Internet rules by sending the neutrality regulations to the federal Office of Management and Budget. That agency is expected
to approve the rules following a 30-day comment period, after which they will be published in the Federal Register. The rules will take effect 60 days after publication, which will probably occur in
October or November.
The GOP has criticized the new rules as a "government takeover" of the Web but, despite the rhetoric, the regulations largely maintain the status quo. The open Internet
order, which was approved 3-2 by the FCC last December, prohibit wireline providers from blocking or degrading traffic or otherwise engaging in unreasonable discrimination. The order also prohibits
wireless providers from blocking sites or competing applications, but doesn't prohibit wireless carriers from creating fast lanes for companies that pay extra.
Broadband carriers already
mostly abide by those rules, but do so voluntarily. Regardless, telecoms say that enshrining those principles in law will discourage investment and innovation. Consumer advocates, on the other hand,
say the regulations won't do enough to protect consumers.
Republicans on Capitol Hill have introduced various legislative proposals aimed at stopping the regulations from taking effect, but
those measures aren't seen as likely to succeed given the support for neutrality in the Senate.
Nonetheless, the rules are seen as vulnerable to challenge because the FCC didn't first
reclassify broadband as a telecommunications service. Instead, broadband is still considered an information service. That distinction could prove fatal for the regulations given that an appellate
court has already ruled that the FCC lacks authority to regulate information services. In that matter, the
U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit vacated the FCC's 2008 order sanctioning Comcast for violating neutrality principles by slowing down BitTorrent traffic.
Two companies -- Verizon and
MetroPCS -- have already asked an appellate court to invalidate the rules, but the case was dismissed as premature. Those providers -- and others as well -- will almost certainly bring a new appeal as
soon as the rules take effect