Everyone who watches streaming TV — all of us — knows that we get way too many of the same ads, over and over and over again. Day in and day out. Week in and week out. And it only seems to be getting worse.
OK, but who's really getting hurt by streaming ad overfrequency? No one dies here. Is it so bad to get so many ads for Capital One and Max (except for Capital One and Max, who are certainly wasting a bunch of money on it)?
Yes, it does matter, and more damage is being caused than we might think. There’s research to prove it.
In July, Magna Global published research with streaming ad platform Nexxen on this very topic, studying results of campaigns involving restaurant company Applebee’s and apparel brand New Balance.
Here's what they found:
1) 87% of connected TV ad viewers said that they received too many of the same ads in their streaming viewing.
2) 83% said that they believed that the oversaturation was intentional, with more than two-thirds of all viewers believing it was the advertiser that was doing it to them intentionally.
3) The more the same ad was viewed in a session, the more the purchase intent of those viewers dropped, with a 16% drop in purchase intent by the 6th impression.
4) After suffering this overfrequency, 36% were inclined to never want to see that ad again.
You don’t believe this study? Do your own anecdotal research, with friends, family, acquaintances, total strangers -- anyone! I bet you’ll find validation for the Magna work.
We need to stop this. We are wasting advertisers’ money. We are hurting their brands. We are creating negative experiences within streaming services, which can only erode loyalty and viewership. We are poisoning that well that so many of us hope to be able to drink out of for decades.
Listen to streaming TV viewers: Overfrequency sucks! Fix it.