
ChatGPT is a failure as a search engine, at least when it
comes to accurately attributing news stories to sources.
Publishers “face the risk of their content being misattributed or misrepresented regardless of
whether they allow OpenAI’s crawlers,” according to a Tow Center analysis, as reported by the Columbia Journalism Review.
The Tow Center selected twenty
publishers at random, including some who have deals with OpenAI, others that are suing OpenAI and unaffiliated publishers that have either allowed or blocked ChatGPT’s search crawler.
The researchers pulled 200 quotes from the 20 publications and asked ChatGPT to identify the sources of each.
Of that 200, ChatGPT provided “partially or entirely incorrect
responses on a hundred and fifty-three occasions, though it only acknowledged an inability to accurately respond to a query seven times. Only in those seven outputs did the chatbot use qualifying
words and phrases like ‘appears,’ ‘it’s possible,’ or ‘might,’ or statements like ‘I couldn’t locate the exact article.’”
advertisement
advertisement
“What we found was not promising for news publishers,” the Tow Center states. “Though OpenAI emphasizes its ability to provide users ‘timely answers with links to relevant
web sources,’ the company makes no explicit commitment to ensuring the accuracy of those citations. This is a notable omission for publishers who expect their content to be referenced and
represented faithfully.”
The Tow Center adds that pasting an exact quote into a traditional search engine like Google or Bing returns either “a visual indication that the search
engine has located the source—bolded text that matches your search—or a message that informs you there are no results. However, ChatGPT rarely declined to answer our queries and instead
resorted to making false assertions when it could not identify the correct source.”
In one instance, ChatGPT misattributes an Orlando
Sentinel article to Time magazine.
“While this issue is likely not unique to queries about publisher content, it does have
implications for things publishers care about, such as trustworthiness, brand safety, and recognition for their work,” the study states.