
The Los Angeles Times is the latest
periodical to announce changes in its approach to opinions.
“Today, we are beginning a new effort to ensure that readers can readily distinguish opinion-driven content from
our news reporting,” writes Patrick Soon-Shiong,
executive chairman of the Times, in a letter to readers. “Any content written from a point of view may be
labeled Voices, which helps to strengthen the separation between what’s news and what’s not. Voices is not strictly limited to Opinion section content. It also includes news commentary,
criticism, reviews, and more."
He adds, ”If a piece takes a stance or is written from a personal perspective, it may be labeled Voices. Any content written from a point of view may be
labeled between what’s news and what’s not. Voices is not strictly limited to Opinion section content. It also includes news commentary, criticism, reviews, and more. If a piece takes a
stance or is written from a personal perspective, it may be labeled Voices.”
advertisement
advertisement
Presumably, this would include journalistic pieces with a narrative thrust, or any article in which the
writer displays a personal style or angle.
Soon-Shiong continues, “We are also releasing Insights, an AI-driven feature that will appear on some Voices content. The purpose of
Insights is to offer readers an instantly accessible way to see a wide range of different AI-enabled perspectives alongside the positions presented in the article.”
What exactly is
Insights? “L.A. Times Insights delivers AI-generated analysis on Voices articles that offer a point of view on an
issue,” Soon-Shiong states. “This may include Opinion columns, editorials, commentary and more.”
Soon-Shiong goes on to say, “Insights analyzes Voices
content to identify where the views expressed may fall on the political spectrum. It also offers an annotated summary of the ideas expressed in the piece along with different views on the topic from a
variety of sources.”
Some of this may provide a way for the Times to distance itself from content that may be offensive to certain politicians. A piece that is even
mildly critical may be accompanied by contrary articles or letters.
However, Soon-Shiong stops short of proclaiming a fixed position for opinion articles, as Washington Post
owner Jeff Bezos did last week.
“We are going to be writing every day in support and defense of two pillars: personal liberties and free markets,” Bezos wrote in an email to
Post staffers. “We’ll cover other topics too of course, but viewpoints opposing those pillars will be left to be published by others.”
We’ll see if the LA
Times follows a similar policy. Like Bezos, Soon-Shiong pulled back from endorsing Kamala Harris—or any candidate—during the 2024 election.
Soon-Shiong also mentioned
that L.A. Times Studios is now producing video-streaming content daily with news, features, and other programming, plus continuous live camera feeds from Los Angeles locations. Will they also be
tagged under the Voices heading if the content veers toward expressing an opinion?