Commentary

Email Open Rates: What's the Alternative?

My previous column, "Why the Email Open Rate Must Die" spawned a spirited debate, mainly on these three topics (click here to read the first column and all 17 comments):

  • Don't kill the open rate, but view it in the proper perspective.
  • PLEASE let it die!
  • What can we replace it with? You don't offer any suggestions other than to say we can do better.

    I stand guilty as charged of not offering an alternative to the open rate in that first column. I will remedy that in this column.

    The Open Rate: Rename, Rethink, Redefine

    So, what are the alternatives to the open rate?

    1. As I understand it, none exist today or in the near future. Some have suggested using CSS (Cascading Style Sheets) to track opens, but many email clients also block CSS. The major email providers (Yahoo, AOL, Hotmail/Live Mail, Gmail) can more accurately track "open or read rates" because the email client resides on their servers and does not have to hit an external server. But, the chance of these email providers sharing open data is as likely as world peace.

    advertisement

    advertisement

    2. So, let's rename it the "Email Render Rate" or something similar that reflects what the tracking images really measure. My proposed "render rate" would more accurately reflect what occurs when images are loaded in a recipient's email client. This includes in preview panes, software clients such as Outlook or Web-based services such as Gmail and Yahoo Mail.

    This redefinition (nothing else changes) will benefit retailers and others for whom product images are important to conversion. A render rate of 25% lets the sender know that their email rendered with images in 25% of the messages seen by recipients' inboxes or smart phones.

    Analyzing the subscriber base by render rate over time would help the marketer better optimize creative for subscribers who normally view images and for those who don't. As smart marketers and the industry make this shift, I'm sure dozens of other creative uses of the render rate would also emerge.

    3. Next, let's de-emphasize the open rate and focus the email scorecard on output and business metrics. I'm not devaluing email process metrics. In fact, I find tremendous value in spam-complaint and unsubscribe rates, for example.

    But ultimately, the only metrics your CEO and CFO care about are those that measure how the email program supports business goals such as growing revenues, increasing margins, improving customer retention and lowering communications costs.

    Use the open rate if you understand its limits and can derive key lessons to improve your email program. More important: Find the key metrics that will enable you to gain a larger share of the marketing budget.

    4. Finally, let's set an industry-standard definition for "open rate." I don't expect the render rate or other ideas to replace the open rate anytime soon. And, to be clear, my employer Silverpop is not fast at work to rid the open rate from our reports.

    But I do hope those of you who are passionate about this topic will join the discussion and process to help shape a better version of the open rate.

    While many of you disagree with me on its value, I see near-unanimous agreement that the open rate has many flaws and needs to change. Please join me on the Email Experience Coalition's Measurement Accuracy Roundtable.

    Let the discussion continue!

  • Next story loading loading..