A federal judge ordered radio host
and white supremacist Hal Turner held without bail Thursday on charges that he threatened federal judges in posts on his blog.
Turner allegedly wrote on his blog that three appellate judges on
the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals "deserve to be killed," according to court papers filed by a FBI agent. "Their blood will replenish the tree of liberty," he allegedly wrote in a June 2 post on
TurnerRadioNetwork.blogspot.com."A small price to pay to assure freedom for millions."
Turner, a resident of North Bergen, N.J., allegedly made the statements on June 2, the same day that the
three appellate judges upheld a ban on handguns in Chicago and Oak Park, Ill. In his blog post, he allegedly referred to the 2005 murder of the husband and mother of U.S. District Court Judge Joan
Lefkow.
"Apparently, the 7th U.S. Circuit didn't get the hint after those killings," Turner allegedly wrote. "It appears another lesson is needed." The following day, Turner allegedly posted the
judges' photos and work addresses and other publicly available information about them. The blog, which had been hosted by Google, is not currently accessible to the public.
Federal authorities
allege that the blog posts support criminal charges of threatening to assault and murder a U.S. judge. But Turner might be able to successfully argue that his comments are a form of protected
political speech, and not a serious threat.
"The question is, 'Is it a threat, or is it advocacy,'" says Paul Alan Levy, a lawyer with free speech group Public Citizen. Advocacy often is
protected by the First Amendment, he says. But, he adds, even speech that just advocates a particular viewpoint can be deemed criminal if it's likely to result in imminent harm.