It's been quite a week in the wonderful world of TwitterCensorship and it's only Wednesday. To recap:
THESE INTERNET SITES IN GENERAL ARE A PROVEN HAVEN FOR MALICIOUS ACTORS AND CONTENT AND ARE PARTICULARLY HIGH RISK DUE TO INFORMATION EXPOSURE, USER GENERATED CONTENT AND TARGETING BY ADVERSARIES.
I'm cool with the Marines on this one. Who would want a national security incident to flare up over the ill-advised posting of a picture to MySpace?
As for the rest of you, lighten up, and let me tell you why we are at a critical juncture in the evolution of social networking and how you can be smart about it: these platforms are coming into such common usage that it's almost equivalent to when there was critical mass for use of the telephone. We are all on a learning curve here trying to figure out what's right and wrong to share, so let your employees be part of the learning curve rather than cutting it off before it even starts.
If you read ESPN's social media guidelines, many of them are so mind-blowingly obvious they really belong under corporate policy, rather than social media policy. There's no need to restate them just for this context, as though social media were some foreign country where a different language is being spoken: I speak specifically of:
1. Assume at all times you are representing ESPN.
2. If you wouldn't say it on the air or write it in your column, don't tweet it.
3. Exercise discretion, thoughtfulness and respect for your colleagues, business associates and our fans.
4. Confidential or proprietary company information or similar information of third parties who have shared such information with ESPN, should not be shared.
Can you say, "Duh?" Aren't these rules already in the corporate handbook somewhere?
The sharp learning curve in social media explains why ESPN and the NFL look like they're governing social media via restrictions - they're scared. But this is actually the time to let loose just a little and put a modicum of trust into the secret sauce that makes your employees representatives of your brand. That doesn't mean that companies shouldn't release guidelines to their employees - just that they should be less draconian in the early offing, and only put in harsher restrictions if there are signs that the looser restrictions aren't working - and then mete out punishment to those who have proven that maybe they shouldn't have such a close relationship with a keyboard. Is this a one-size-fits-all exercise? No. To compare and contrast ESPN and the NFL, the ESPN people are in the communications business; NFL players are not. That doesn't mean that ESPN people should be free to tweet, and NFL players should not, but that social media training should be adapted accordingly, just as media training always has been for people in the public eye.
Investing in social media education, rather than issuing a 12-step plan on how to make your employees so scared of social networking that they won't even look at Facebook, isn't the right step. This is what ESPN essentially did (and yes, there are 12 guidelines - it would take 11.3 tweets just to pump them all out on Twitter).
Based on the statement ESPN has issued since Ric Bucher let word slip on Twitter last night that "the hammer just came down," it seems like some of the people at the network actually get it. But rather than let cooler heads prevail, the network handed off the duty of drafting the so-called guidelines to Stalin's next of kin, who infamously declared: "The first and only priority is to serve ESPN sanctioned efforts, including sports news, information and content." As any social media person can tell you, part of the power of social nets is that they humanize - and humanizing brands makes brands stronger. I found this rather poignant post in Bucher's tweetstream while writing the column:
"Rolled into Big Sur at sunset and Iz came on the radio singing 'Somewhere Over the Rainbow.' Sometimes the universe hits the perfect chord."ESPN, you gotta problem with that? According to your social media guidelines, you do.