"What is it?" my partner asked as we stood this weekend before a large puke-green movie poster with only a single graphic, a big honkin' 2D scan code. That was it. No title for the film,
just a fugly code that was supposed to engage our curiosity.
"It's a 2D code for your phone. It wants us to scan it."
"Oh, I thought it was one of those
optical illusion things where you focus right in front of it and a hidden image is revealed. This is just ugly."
I already knew where this was going to go, but being the "mobile
guinea pig" that I have become, there was no alternative but to chase yet another misguided campaign down its marketing rabbit hole. For the record, we got to the theater on this Baby Boomer
hegira to see "Taking Woodstock" too early, so there was loads of time to kill.
As soon as I saw this 2D-coded movie poster I knew I might need every minute of the time cushion.
While I fussed with the phone, I asked my partner to keep an eye on the movie poster to see if anyone else took the bait.
No worries there. In 20 minutes of throngs pouring past the poster in
this enormous multiplex, not a single taker emerged. A few people got close enough to see the smaller prompt on the poster to text "reader" to 436287, but then they sensibly shook their
heads and moved on.
Apparently a crappy-looking block of black and white squares is not enough of a call to action in this country. Stupid consumers. They don't know what they're
missing. They could be as hip and edgy as me, sitting in the food court, waiting for the next generation of mobile marketing to wrap them in its warm embrace.
"Who is calling you?"
"The movie poster. It is sending me a link to download a reader so I can take a snapshot of the poster and send it in and get a link to a mobile Web site for the movie."
"You're kidding me."
Indeed. So the SMS pushes me to 9.msite.tv/reader, where I see that we are on the trail of promotions for the upcoming Tim Burton-produced flick
"9." Fine. But the landing page is so dark, and the text so imperceptible even on my iPhone, that I miss the "download" text link to the NeoReader app. I end up downloading an
alternative QR reader, which actually does effectively link me up to the 9.msite.tv/qr1.
Now, I don't mean to be petty, but did this movie poster just make me send an SMS to get a text link
to open a WAP site to download a reader, to take a snapshot of a 2D code to link me back up to the same domain I was at three steps ago? More to the point, wouldn't I have been better off typing
the mobile URL directly into my browser at the start? The URL was just a few characters longer than the keyword + shortcode number, wasn't it? Anyone want to talk me down?
No, wait. I get
it. Now that I have the reader installed, "9" will be able to hit me with other 2D codes as they march me towards that "9-9-09" opening. And I will be privy to a bevy of worthwhile
goodies and exclusives, right? I say this only half in jest, because QR codes can be an effective shortcut to complex URLs and they can pay off the curious user with fun and clever assets. But it is
the payoff that matters, not the technology. There is no getting around their sheer ugliness and the way they intrude on fine creative. But that is another argument. In this case, from beginning to
end, it really was more about the technology than any discernible message -- let alone a consumer benefit.
"After all of that, it's a one-minute trailer?" she asks. "Ooh,
Tim Burton got fat. What is this movie about? It's too dark. I can't see anything. What is the point? What does this have to do with the ugly movie poster thingie?"
My family asks
me these things as if I am perennial defender of all things mobile and the keeper of the code that explains all of these weird marketing excursions that underwhelm them every time. After all, even she
can see that this entire exercise just landed me at the URL I could have started on fifteen minutes ago and gotten the same unimpressive promo materials. Add to that the fact that the mobile Web site
uses microscopic greenish letters on a black background, making almost all of the text nigh-invisible. Even the videos (which are too dim even for the iPhone LCD) are labeled with titles that presume
the viewer already knows something about the film. "The Shane Timur Intro Plus Winged Beast Clip." Huh? After all of this I still know nothing about the film except that it is animated, by
Tim Burton, and that I should dilate my pupils before seeing it.
Maybe my love was right in the first place. That fugly movie poster really was an optical illusion. Stare into the QR code
long enough and you can see the outlines of a mystery message: "Sucker!"