
I guess
this is pretty much the definition of a craze: It appears that almost half the companies that use social media for advertising, marketing, PR, customer relations, or recruiting have jumped into the
arena without first determining what they hope to achieve or the methods they will employ to achieve it. At least, that's the impression I get from the results of a new study of corporate social media
usage by Digital Brand Expressions, aptly titled "Social Media Without a Parachute."
According to DBE, which surveyed execs from 100 companies of varying sizes (ranging from under 50 to over
1,000 employees), 78% of respondents said their companies were using social media -- but just 41% said they had a strategic plan. Crunching the numbers, that means that 48% of respondents who are
using social media have no strategic plan. In a sadly comical finding, 88% of the group without a social media plan agreed that having a plan was important -- just something on their "to-do" list, I
suppose. Moving over to the companies with a social media plan, there was clear agreement that marketing is a natural social media utility, with 100% of respondents agreeing that marketing should be
involved in formulating the social media plan.
It's alarming but not terribly surprising that half the companies using social media are basically flying blind. After all, we've seen this
before: remember the invasion of Iraq in 2003?
No, seriously -- I'm not trying to be flippant, and obviously the stakes are immeasurably smaller when you're just trying to sell toothpaste to
someone -- but there are definite similarities: You rush to get into a space at minimal expense, with no thought for what happens once you're there; you plunge into a large, diverse population you
basically know nothing about in the hopes they will receive you with open arms; and your goals are so general (and ludicrously optimistic) as to be meaningless, giving no hint as to how they might
actually be achieved: "We will have a successful social media presence" is about as well-though and easily achievable as "Iraq will be a democracy."
And, of course, (acknowledging again that
the stakes are not morally equivalent, or even comparable) the Iraq metaphor reveals the danger of this approach, which might be described as "flying by the seat of your bare ass": Above all, what
happens when things don't work out? Because you didn't consider multiple contingencies, including less-than-ideal scenarios, you don't have enough personnel deployed when it turns out the population
isn't friendly and thrilled to see you -- substituting, say, customer service for neighborhood policing, and critical tweets or Facebook posts for IEDs. The small force you have assigned to the task
risks becoming overwhelmed and demoralized by the onslaught and the lack of support from higher-ups. Suddenly, your Mission Accomplished banner looks a bit premature. Maybe you should have given more
thought to these issues before you went in?
But it's too late: you can't back out now, having already committed your prestige (brand) to this highly public project. Now comes the long,
painful, and very costly process of compensating for negligence in the early stages of the process. With all eyes on your organization (because you succeeded in getting the world's attention, even if
it wasn't in the way you hoped) you have to actually understand the sources of negative sentiment so you can address them, for example through large-scale ethnographic surveys and opinion polling.
Once you understand the landscape of public opinion, you have to identify potential friends and allies, and convince them to enlist in your cause despite the risks to their own reputation and
credibility -- an incredibly difficult task, given your large-scale screw-ups already on record, which will require a 100% sincere and persuasive sales pitch. At the same time, you may forge secret
relationships with influential figures (bloggers, religious clerics) who can help shape public opinion in return for a favor or fee -- but you have to be careful, because if these covert recruits are
ever exposed, you and they are finished.
Again, just to be clear: I'm not actually saying social media campaigns are in any way "the same" as the war in Iraq, which obviously takes place on
an entirely different moral plane. I'm just noting similar dynamics which result when large organizations undertake complex, ambitious projects without sufficient planning.