Commentary

What Is The Value Of A Facebook Fan? Zero

It is a question I hear several times a week: What is the value of a Facebook Fan? I've seen answers ranging from $136.38 to $3.60. I can't blame vendors, agencies and consultants from trying to answer the question -- the hunger from clients is so great that anyone promising a simple answer is likely to get attention. The problem is that there is no simple answer to such a complex question. I'd suggest that marketers approach this question as if the answer is zero, unless and until the brand does something to create value with Facebook Fans.

There are numerous reasons the question of Facebook fan valuation is problematic:

  • Assumptions: The methodologies for estimating the value of a Facebook fan rely on a host of assumptions, but every audience, brand and program is unique. For example, the value of a fan for big-ticket items cannot be the same as a fan for lower-consideration items.
  • All fans are not equal: Every individual has a unique social graph and a unique voice. I might be considered influential on topics of Social Media and Marketing, but my opinion on floor mops might hold little influence within my set of friends and followers. One's value as an influencer varies from category to category.
  • Acquisition matters: How a fan is acquired makes a difference. A fan who organically "likes" a brand has more potential value than one that is encouraged to click the "like" button in exchange for a coupon or some Farmville bucks.
  • Cause and effect: Which came first, the chicken or the egg? Do fans spend more because Facebook fans spend more, or do people who spend more become fans? If the former, then Facebook fans are generating new value, but if the latter is true, then Facebook fandom merely reflects existing value rather than creating new value for brands.

The smart marketer will approach the question of value as if the answer is zero -- there is no intrinsic value to a Facebook fan. This might sound sacrilegious to social media marketers, but think of it this way: What's the value of an email subscriber if the company never uses the database for anything? And what's the value of the same email subscriber if the company has a smart, user-focused strategy for email? It is what companies do with fans that creates value, not merely that a brand has fans.

If you find it concerning to consider Facebook fans as valueless, perhaps you might consider the difference between potential value and realized value. There is an appropriate and interesting corollary in the world of high school physics: If you lift a ball off the ground and hold it stationary, it has no kinetic energy but it does have potential energy; drop the ball, and the potential energy becomes kinetic energy. Facebook fans are like that -- all potential energy until you introduce something that creates kinetic energy. As such, the operative question isn't "What is the value of a Facebook Fan?" but "How do I make my Facebook fans valuable?"

A Facebook fan has one primary value in the absence of activation by brands, and that is for risk mitigation, but even that value is made greater when brands foster stronger relationships with engaged fans. (Self-promotion alert: Watch for my new Forrester report on the ROI of Social Media Marketing, due out within weeks. Risk mitigation is one perspective discussed, and when combined with other measurement approaches conveyed in the report, should assist marketers to assess the value they create with their social media efforts in Facebook and in other social venues.)

What do you think? Have you found easy ways to value your fans on Facebook? Or is real value only created when you unleash the potential value of fans via programs, interaction, information, and other sorts of engagement?

14 comments about "What Is The Value Of A Facebook Fan? Zero".
Check to receive email when comments are posted.
  1. Andrew Ettinger, July 8, 2010 at 8:48 a.m.

    excellent article!

  2. Aarona Jordan from Channel One/Alloy, July 8, 2010 at 9:43 a.m.

    Valuable commentary and insightful direction to the agency ready to answer their clients clamor for Facebook courageously.

  3. Tom Cunniff from Combe Incorporated, July 8, 2010 at 10:08 a.m.

    Smart.

    Actually, it's not a big stretch to assign the value of a Facebook fan a negative number.

    It's common practice for brands to pay to acquire fans, and many of those who remain fans only do so to get discounts.

    if you stop there, it's 100% investment and zero return.

    It's easy to buy fans. As you suggest at the end of this post, creating value from them is a much more difficult task.

  4. Augie Ray from American Express, July 8, 2010 at 11:24 a.m.

    Tom, thanks for the comment, and a great point!

    And Aarona, thanks for the comment!

  5. Adam Day from MRA, Inc, July 8, 2010 at 11:30 a.m.

    Hey Augie, Check out the interactive Microsoft Banner above your article?
    Facebook Fan valuation is dependent on comparative value for consumer top of mind awareness, relative cost of product, ability to target consumer market, under this assumption, you can definitely say at least $0.01 to $136.83 for the average lifetime consumer value for impressions viewed on a network. But ZERO! I can definitely say your boss needs to review your belief that an advertising branding point and opportunity has zero value and suggest you start looking for a new job!

  6. Nicole Lyons from Local Yokel Media, July 8, 2010 at 12:30 p.m.

    YIKES! Okay, let me first admit that I was terrible at physics in high school. But zero and negative valuation of FB Fans makes me very uncomfortable. I understand the difference between potential and realized value, so I see what you mean about ways a brand's interaction with the fan is required to create *more* value, because isn't that true across all customer touch-points?

    I guess what makes me nervous is that to label them a "zero" might suggest that their "potential" begins at zero, which suggests that who that fan is and what their value is to the business prior to their interaction with the brand through this channel (FB) is irrelevant.

    On the contrary, as I've seen to be true of website visitors and email subscribers across a variety of brands and industries over the past ten years of study, each new fan indeed clicks that "Like" button with some sort of pre-existing opinion about the brand, affinity for the brand, intent to purchase, and expectation of what "opting in" to a continued relationship with the brand via FB will mean to them. Influencers and Opinion Leaders and social graphs aside, although I think those are critical baseline factors to consider, even when it comes to basic brand health metrics, fans are not all equal coming through the door, and to treat them as such makes a 'smart, user-focused strategy' practically impossible, doesn't it?

    Furthermore, I wonder how a business can evaluate the impact of their activation of/interaction with these fans without knowing what their true baseline is?

    Thanks so much for this article, and looking forward to your report (and feedback) as I'm sure it will clarify some of this!

  7. Mark Burrell from Tongal, July 8, 2010 at 12:49 p.m.

    Very Insightful. I'd ask this of Tom though? If a fan stays somewhere for a discount, I'd think that would be of extreme value. Some "fans" are BS though and just people given an assignment do something by a an employer or friend.

    I'd like to believe that the fans, especially for a small brand can of enormous value if engaged in the right manner.

  8. John Egan from Wayfinder Analytics, July 8, 2010 at 2:05 p.m.

    The Kin campaign certainly seems to support your premise; looking forward to the report!

  9. Bryan Kimbell from Adrenalin, Inc, July 8, 2010 at 3:19 p.m.

    Absolutely true - and I appreciate the analogy of kinetic vs. potential energy. All Facebook, Twitter or social media and even potential demographic targets should be looked at in the "potential" energy/value until the company acts and sets them in motion, thus creating a "kinetic" energy/value that grows (or declines if not done properly).

    I find that the value of a FB fan is in the activation and engagement level of the average fan. However, you don't have to engage all fans, some just want to be affiliated with the brand and are perfectly content reading updates and finding out about deals, promotions, etc. before making purchasing decisions.

  10. Katherine Melick from Lawler Ballard Van Durand, July 8, 2010 at 3:40 p.m.

    Great post! I have been researching the “worth” of online impressions versus traditional media impressions all day.

    Online/social media is a different playing field than traditional media. Advertiser must know how to USE and maintain it and not just pay for it!

  11. Tom Troja from Social Sympony, July 8, 2010 at 3:42 p.m.

    Depends on what the brand plans to do with them. As they sit on facebook now... pretty worthless. As they are part of a long term vision to create relationships and develop the connective tissue between the brand and the people over time to be brand champions and customers... the value curve increases.
    Remember we just call them fans.. they really aren't... they arrived here for various reasons. The brands job now is to cultivate those that choose to engage and among togther things... move them to brand owned communities where both brands and people can find more value.

  12. Augie Ray from American Express, July 8, 2010 at 5:16 p.m.

    I really appreciate all of the great dialog and comments. MediaPost readers are thoughtful folks!

  13. Eric Steckel from Turnpike Digital, July 19, 2010 at 8:04 p.m.

    I think that some of the posters might be hung up on the zero number and not reading it correctly. The article says to view them "as if" they have no value. The real value they hold is in activating that value.

    Of course, there is some impression made in getting them to like, but it's hard to apply a value to that. Better to look at the potential you have with that audience and work from there.

  14. Vinod Nambiar from Position2, October 8, 2010 at 6:04 a.m.

    Great article. And yes, one can find innumerable ways of quantifying it. IMHO, I guess the value will always be "relative" to the marketer. Just like LTV (life time value) is unique to each. What can be common is a formula.

    We at Position2 have been looking at numbers as defined by what we have coined an "addressable market".

    A fan is in a sense an easily addressable segment of people. i.e The marketer can reach them with lesser investment. [here again a cost can be arrived at - just like we have stats that indicate how much it costs to get a new customer vs. selling to an existing one.]

    So if I had 20,000 fans. The value can be derived by looking at the cost it will take me to reach them, and include cost for message. E.g if it is an offer, what is the sales cost.

    The fan then can also provide a "viral" effect.

    One could look at using metrics used by loyalty systems, and perhaps even initiate some currency like Facebook miles!

    It's early on in the game - it will be good to see what prevails.


Next story loading loading..