Commentary

#PrayForJapan

My heart skips a beat every time I think about the victims of last week's devastating earthquake and tsunamis in Japan. The planet once again has humbled us and reminds us that there are far more important things to worry about than digital marketing. My wife and I survived the Boxing Day tsunami in Thailand in 2004. Although an image can speak a thousand words, I can confirm firsthand that even the most dramatic and horrific imagery and videos are simply not able to portray the scope and gravity of the situation on the ground. Add to that an impending nuclear meltdown, and we are in the midst of one of the biggest disasters of our lifetimes.

Back in 2004, the lack of ubiquitous social media platforms and a stable mobile data infrastructure meant that as millions of people were affected, the world turned to CNN, the BBC and other mainstream news sources for breaking updates. However, these sources took a number of days to move past the regurgitation of the same headlines.

The role of social media and consumer-generated content in disseminating information, facilitating communication, and rallying support in the immediate aftermath of disaster is not really news -- and even less so to the readers of MediaPost. In fact, we have crossed a point where the benefits of the interrelationship of traditional media with the real-time nature of social media is expected, providing exponential improvements in the speed, diversity, and accuracy of information and communication. 

advertisement

advertisement

#PrayForJapan, #tsunami, and #Japan instantly became trending topics on Twitter and Google Trends. I found myself heading to Citizen Tube to view curated videos from the region. Facebook was my primary means of ensuring that friends and their families in Japan were accounted for and safe (thankfully they were). Twitter became my dashboard to updates from local and international media, as well as firsthand accounts from local residents. Relevant CNN, AP and BBC stories were interwoven in my social media streams because social media fuels as much discovery for journalists and authoritative news organizations as it does for consumers. These were my knee-jerk reaction sources -- very different from just over five years ago during the tsunami in Thailand.

Speaking of knee-jerk reactions, marketers never cease to surprise me in their quest for visibility. In the wake of this disaster, a lapse in judgment turned a potentially noble gesture by Microsoft's Bing into a crass marketing tactic that sparked immediate outrage. Rather than donating $100K and tweeting about their good deed to encourage others to donate, the social media team decided to donate $1 for every retweet, up to $100K. Seven hours later the company apologized for its short-sighted decision. Really, Bing? You didn't see that one coming a mile away?

Tweet

It was only one month ago when Kenneth Cole made the mistake of referring to the uproar in Cairo as a response to the release of their spring line. The Bing and Kenneth Cole examples clearly demonstrate the human element of social media, although these negative examples are the exception and not the rule. I can hear the pages of social media policies and guidelines being updated as we speak. While social media has clearly increased the impact of activism, marketers must be careful about shallow associations with causes. Be prepared to genuinely help, or stand clear for those who are. 

I don't mean to use this column to preach, and surely your social networks are brimming with ways to give. Granted, Japan is no third-world nation. But they do need the world's support. Here are a few links for those who want to help. #PrayForJapan

Text RedCross to 90999 to donate $10

Google Crisis Response Center [http://www.google.com/crisisresponse/japanquake2011.html]

Facebook Disaster Relief Page [http://www.facebook.com/DisasterRelief]

Dog Bless You (Rescue Dogs) [http://www.facebook.com/exploredogs]

3 comments about "#PrayForJapan".
Check to receive email when comments are posted.
  1. Brandon Sutton from brandonsutton.com, March 15, 2011 at 3:07 p.m.

    I agree with you 100% Jason. I had a similar reaction to an article on MediaPost from yesterday that I'm still mad I clicked through to. Erik Sass evidently thought it was appropriate to stoop to comparisons of user-generated content vs. professional content in the Japan disaster. It was so unbelievably offensive! Here we are in the aftermath of one of the biggest disasters in the history of humanity and the lead article on MediaPost's email is about whose video content of death and destruction is of better quality? I'm so offended that I've considered unsubscribing entirely. This article might just have saved my subscription actually.

    Let's use our platforms to help those who are suffering, shall we? There will be plenty of time for frivolous chatter after everyone moves on and we're back to obsessing about Lada GaGa and Justin Bieber.

    Thanks for standing up and reminding us how tender this moment really is. I appreciate hearing heartfelt perspectives of real people in industry articles.

  2. Jason Heller from AGILITi, March 15, 2011 at 10:43 p.m.

    Thanks Brandon. Appreciate the kind words.

  3. Paula Lynn from Who Else Unlimited, April 12, 2011 at 7:45 p.m.

    Power and greed with healthy doses of selfishness. "I am talking, talking, talking." How few people listened, really listened?

Next story loading loading..