Commentary

Meredith Sheds Time Inc. Legacy

How Meredith Corp.’s handled magazine titles inherited in last year’s acquisition of Time Inc. provides an interesting case study for a publishing industry coping with deep cuts in ad revenue.

The company quickly determined it needed to shed some of Time’s most prestigious titles, namely Time, Sports Illustrated, Fortune and Money. Meredith management also saw more potential for People magazine, with its mix of exclusive Hollywood coverage, human-interest stories and true-crime accounts.

Meredith executives have provided the kind of impartial analysis that Time needed to be freed from nostalgia and the burden of its esteemed legacy, as The Wall Street Journal reported last week. Without an attachment to Time’s past, Meredith focused on practical concerns, such as profit growth.

advertisement

advertisement

“We aren’t media barons,” Meredith CEO Tom Harty told the WSJ.

Like all publishers, Meredith is working to limit the damage of declining print revenue, which doesn’t show any sign of abating. eMarketer forecasts print and digital magazine ad spending will decline about 20% in the next four years as advertisers put more marketing dollars into internet search and social media.

Keeping a lower cost structure is a key part of lifting the profitability of former Time Inc. titles.

The publisher slashed Time’s expenses and let go of 600 New York employees who were paid more than workers at Meredith’s headquarters in Des Moines, Iowa. Personnel costs make up about half of the $550 million that Meredith estimated it could save during the first three years after the acquisition.

In determining which of Time Inc.'s titles to sell, Meredith didn’t see a future for magazines providing news and sports coverage amid online competitors that provide real-time updates.

Meredith favors lifestyle content that isn’t time-sensitive and focuses on the styles of famous personalities. Its Magnolia Journal, a quarterly that features home-renovation stars Chip and Joanna Gaines, reached a record profit in its first year for Meredith.

People historically had been one of the most profitable magazines in the country, but its ad pages were falling rapidly, alongside a drop in newsstand sales, to an average of 354,000 per issue last year vs. 1.5 million a decade earlier, according to the Alliance for Audited Media.

As the owner of 17 TV stations, Meredith saw an opportunity to cross-brand People’s celebrity coverage on TV. It launched “People Now Weekend” to derive more revenue from the magazine’s investment in content.

Meredith also plans an expansion of People’s ecommerce efforts on People.com, which is now its second-biggest ecommerce site behind the one for Better Homes & Gardens.

1 comment about "Meredith Sheds Time Inc. Legacy".
Check to receive email when comments are posted.
  1. Ed Papazian from Media Dynamics Inc, May 28, 2019 at 8:59 a.m.

    Interesting take by meredith but I question some of the assumptions cited. For example there is no doubt that the "weeklies" were facing a huge problem keeping their issues stocked with ads.  They had already cut their unprofitable circulations and frequencies but were still hurting badly in ad sales---not because those ad dollars were going into social media or search campaigns on the Internet but, mainly, as they were and still are being used to pay for higher CPMs in TV. Also, the real reson why Meredith kept "People" is that it's largely a womens' oriented publication, not a mostly male interest magazine such as those that were sold. Hence, "People" is a far better fit with the other Meredith titles where ad sales and digital synergies are concerned.

Next story loading loading..