Commentary
The Decline Of Western Civilization (In Two Simple Charts)
- by Joe Mandese @mp_joemandese, December 10, 2021
As I was organizing my thoughts for this week's "Red, White & Blog," a striking piece of data popped into my inbox illustrating just what's been at stake and who is winning the info wars. The stat, courtesy of a Statista, shows that after rising steadily through the last century, the % of the world's population living in a democracy has suddenly plummeted since the beginning of this one, falling from more than half to less than one third.
It illustrates half the point I wanted to make this week, as President Joe Biden hosts the first ever Democracy Summit: that democracy around the world is in steep decline. The Statista analysis, based on Our World Data, only goes through 2020, but we can all imagine where it will net out for 2021.
That's half the story. The other half, is why? Obviously, there are many factors contributing to the decline of democracy -- political, military, etc. -- but seeing as this is a MediaPost column, I'd like to focus on the role of media, specifically, the rise of the internet. According to Our World Data, the world population's penetration of internet access shows an even steeper curve -- dramatically upward -- since it was benchmarked in 1990.
advertisement
advertisement
Now I'm not saying it's the only correlation, but it is a meaningful one, so I mashed up the two charts, overlaying the growth of the internet with the demise of democracies in the chart below. What does it show?
Between 1990 and 2016, the world's population with internet access shot up from 0% to about 75%, while the percentage living under democratic rule fell from about 55% to 32% in 2020.
The irony of this is that when the internet was first booming, its zealots championed it as "the democratization of media," you know, because of the whole Gutenberg Unbound thing.
And while it's true that the internet has contributed to some forms of democracy -- main free market enterprises -- its economics, and the sophistication of various actors to leverage that -- still is concentrated in the hands of a few. And as we've been seeing by recent history, as well as recent testimony as Congress considers creating new laws regulating it -- including this week's chest-thumping during Instagram CEO's, how shall we see, less-than-completely-transparent testimony -- hostile actors appear to have leveraged it best. Especially social media.
In 2017, MediaPost bestowed one of its Agency of the Year Awards to Russia's Internet Research Agency for is ingenious -- not to mention incredibly economic -- use of social media, especially Facebook, to destabilize American democracy. Hostile actors, including Russia, have continued to do so, even as social media have promised to create new safeguards.
As Senate committee co-chair Connecticut Senator Richard Blumenthal told Instagram's chief, the time for deliberation is over, and its time to create new laws regulating what Big Tech platforms like social media can and cannot do, including removing their liability protections covered under Section 230.
I only hope it's soon, because as Devin Nunes appointment as CEO of TMTG (Trump Media & Technology Group), the billion dollar publicly-traded enterprise that is expected to launch a new social media platform soon, will only add fuel to democracy's fire sale.
Joe Mandese is the Editor in Chief of MediaPost. You can reach Joe at joe@mediapost.com.
Hmmmm Joe.
There seems to be some run data ih those graphs.
For example 1900 is stated as 3% democracies. The global population at the turn of the 20th century was 1.65b, which pegs the 'democratic population' was 49.5m.
Just looking at the 1900 population of three key long-standing democracies, we have the US at 78m, the UK at 40m and France at 39m. Those three countries alone total 155 which is not far short of 10% of the global population. That is, the starting point looks wrong.
Looking at 2020 your article states that "the percentage living under democratic rule fell from about 55% to 32% in 2020.". That is a 23% decline when the global population was c. 7.8b. That works out at 1.8b people lost democracy just in 2020. One would think that would make the headlines, or maybe I missed some un-reported coups.
These kinds of corelations are interesting John and Joe.For example when radio was king---during the 1920s and 1930s we saw the rise of fascism in Germany and Italy as well as Japan's invasion of China and the Spanish Civil War---all not very good for democracy---but still under the sway of radio, we had WW2 where the "bad guys" were defeated and "democracy" restored to western Europe and Japan. Then along comes TV and what happens? China goes Communist, North Korea invades South Korea, the Hungarian Revolution and one in East Germany get crushed and it gets worse---The VietNam War grows bigger and bigger, The Czechs are invaded by the Warsaw Pact, The Israeli-Arab wars come one after the other, etc. But at the end---with TV ---"linear TV"---- still dominant we have the fall of the Soviet Empire. Maybe the same pattern will repeat itself with the Internet. In the beginning, we have problems---The Middle East is all screwed up, The Syrian Revolt, ISIS, 9/11, etc. but now, after 20-25 years, perhaps it will all turn around. After all, now we have Biden. Maybe, next we will find a magical metric that affords "comparability" between "linear TV" and digital video/streaming "impressions".