I don’t know a single company that hasn’t articulated their values in some form or another. And I don’t know a single exercise that provokes more cynicism and eye-rolling than the
articulation of company values.
It’s understandable. The all-too-common experience goes something like this: We do a brainstorming exercise. We do a narrowing exercise. We land on
the things we always land on (Integrity! Fun! One team! Customer excellence!). We put them up on the wall. Maybe we’ll write a press release about it.
And nothing changes.
There’s an even worse possibility: The boss writes the values. Hands them down from on high. Puts them up on the wall.
And nothing changes.
Is it any wonder we’re
cynical? Any wonder that, while 80% of employers think they are values-aligned with employees, only 53% of employees
think they are?
advertisement
advertisement
Here is Truth #1: Values are meaningless. What matters is behavior. And the equation is simple: if your values match your behavior, you build trust; if they
don’t, you lose trust.
Here is Truth #2: The only way to align values with behavior is to embed them into the systems, processes, and infrastructure of the organization.
What
does that look like? Four steps.
First, it requires articulating the behaviors associated with each value. If one of your organizational values is customer service, what does
that look like in practice? What are go/no-go behaviors? Is the customer always right, no matter the cost? What’s an example of a time we got this right? A time when we got it wrong? How can you
tell if someone is delivering according to the expectations set by this value?
Second, once the behaviors get articulated, it’s time to build them into the systems. Use
them in recruitment, in induction, in performance reviews, in bonus calculations. Set up rituals: reminders at the beginning of meetings, monthly discussions on where adhering to the values gets
tricky. Don’t just leave them on the wall; bring them to life every day.
Third -- critically -- leaders must be relentless in holding themselves to account for living in
the organization’s values. Every time a manager says, “We value transparency!” and then talks behind people’s backs, the message gets reinforced that you’re not serious
about this stuff.
Finally, if you really want to build a team whose values match their behavior, you must be willing to be a hard-ass about it -- to the degree that
someone’s consistent disregard for the values and their associated behaviors should be cause for dismissal.
But, Kaila, that’s way too harsh! I can’t require people to
behave according to our values!
OK, then why do you have them? What is the point?
If people cannot be held to account for behaving according to the values, the values are
meaningless.
If you only judge people on output, they learn that their behavior doesn’t matter -- the values are meaningless.
But if you have translated your values into clear
behaviors, ensured they are built into the rituals, systems, and infrastructure of the organization, modeled them relentlessly yourself as a leader, held others to account… There is no
ambiguity. The message becomes clear:
This is a place where we behave in alignment with what we say is important to us.
This is a place where we don’t just care about what we
produce; we care about how we show up.
This is a place where we have taken meaningless values and turned them into something meaningful.
And nobody would roll their eyes at
that.