As someone who's spent three decades in media and marketing, I've watched in horror as we've systematically dismantled the foundation of American democracy -- not with a bang, but with a thousand cost-cutting meetings and "pivot to video" strategies. The devastating earthquake that just rocked our U.S. political landscape wasn't a surprise; it was the inevitable aftershock of letting our Fourth Estate crumble like an abandoned rust belt factory.
Remember when we actually had journalists in every state capitol? When "fact-checking" wasn't a partisan buzzword, but something that happened before stories were published? Those quaint days feel as distant as rotary phones and civil political discourse.
Instead, we've created a dystopian information ecosystem that would make Orwell cringe.
According to a Pew research Center study released in mid-November, 21% of Americans now get their "news" from social media influencers—self-appointed prophets of truth who wouldn't know AP style if it bit them in their perfectly filtered faces.
advertisement
advertisement
And just when we desperately need reliable information more than ever, what do our remaining bastions of journalism do? They throw up paywalls faster than gated communities in a crime wave. CNN, Reuters, and others have essentially decided that fact-checked news is a luxury good, leaving the masses to forage for truth in the dumpster fire of social media.
The result? A perfect storm of misinformation that's left our democracy gasping for air. We've replaced Walter Cronkite with “@TruthWarrior69,” and local news with algorithmic fever dreams. Shocking election results? Please. The only shock is that we're still shocked.
Smart industry leaders are already pivoting hard. Here's what winning looks like in 2025:
1. Go deep, not wide. Stop trying to be everywhere. Pick your trusted media partners carefully and double down on depth. Better to own the conversation in two credible outlets than scatter budget across twenty questionable ones.
2. Embrace the new gatekeepers—but choose wisely. Yes, news influencers are here to stay. But partner with those who've built trust through consistency and transparency, not just follower counts.
3. Look for brilliant paradoxes. The Onion buying Infowars' assets in bankruptcy isn't just delicious irony—it's marketing genius. The planned relaunch as a self-aware parody creates a unique platform for brands brave enough to speak truth to power through satire. When Bluesky (which exploded to 16 million+ users post-Nov. 6) needs to maintain its growth later on, where better to reach critical thinkers than a platform that turns conspiracy theory inside out?
4. Build trust through transparency. In a world where truth is contested territory, brands that consistently show their work will win. Document your sources. Explain your processes. Make fact-checking part of your brand story.
The collapse of traditional media doesn't have to mean the death of informed discourse. It just means we need to be more creative about rebuilding it.
For every dying newspaper, there's an opportunity for new formats that combine journalistic rigor with modern engagement. For every paywalled institution, there's space for innovative models that make quality information accessible.
The aftershocks of this media earthquake will reverberate for years. But from the rubble, smarter, more authentic ways of connecting with audiences will emerge. The question isn't whether to adapt—it's whether we'll do it thoughtfully enough to help rebuild democracy's foundation, one credible conversation at a time.
Great article Chris. RE; the Onion taking over InfoWars - I'll take truth wrapped in comedy over lies cloaked in outrage anytime.
Thank you, Ann. Glad you liked the piece. We have taken to watching comedy shows, fantasy cartoons and old movies since the aftershock of Nov. 6th - and, typically, I am an absolute news fanatic. Still getting all my e-newsletters and daily news alerts from top media, but just have not quite come back to the stark reality quite yet. Our newest "fave" is watching "The Daily Show" in the early AM over coffee vs. "TODAY" or MSNBC programming. #betterfornow
Chris: A truly refreshing and insightful piece that in some ways echoes my various comments in Media Post (as a frequent exclusive contributor) most notably regarding the greatest threat to democracy and quality (thoroughly verified, i.e., BBC News) journalism there has ever been - social media! Its content has surely been protected by Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, CDA, for far too long.
The recent fine of $25 million on META for its political shannagins (per Wendy Davis in Media Post this week) while following sentencing guidelines hould have been $250 million or more to have any meaningful effect.
As a proud member of the "Advertising: Who Cares? Movement, a question that would reveal so much is, "Which major advertisers returned to Twitter/X after the WFA was threatened with a law suit over their social media Guidelines initiative?"
The answer could perhaps drive a wonderful campaign to expose such marketers for their blatant contribution to the erosion of credible serious informed media (which typically generate the most impactful and cost effective "attention" to ad campaigns for a brand's target group relative to the often dangerous environments offerred by the social media.)
Look forward to more commentaries from you.
Hey Tony - appreciate your input and elaboration on the issue. Yes, as someone who has been a lead plaintiff in a class-action lawsuit vs. Google/YouTube for - basically, not providing curation of its platform, treating people differently based on who they are - not their content, and being a major cause of our traditional media meltdown, while be shielded by Section 230 (just those mere 28 words) ...
I could not agree with you more that now is time to regulate social "media" platforms.
I have suddenly been fired up (woke?) since Nov. 6. You will be hearing more from me :)
- Knight