Shari, I'm going to ask you to consider doing something bold—something that goes against the grain of short-term investor logic and the lure of a clean exit: Rethink the sale of CBS News as part of the Paramount/Skydance deal.
First, let me be clear: I understand the bind you're in.
Paramount Global isn’t just another media company struggling in the streaming era. It’s a legacy conglomerate, burdened by a sprawling structure, a shrinking cable business, and growing Wall Street skepticism. You control it through National Amusements Inc., holding 77.4% of the voting power despite owning only 9.7% of the equity. That leverage—once your strength—is now a target.
You’re up against:
advertisement
advertisement
That’s the bind: You hold the reins of a media giant Wall Street wants to dismember. The Skydance deal offers capital, clarity, and an elegant exit.
Follow the Capital—And the Influence
Let’s be clear-eyed about who’s backing this deal. David Ellison may be fronting the acquisition, but the capital—and control—comes largely from his father, Larry Ellison. Larry isn’t a neutral player. He’s one of Donald Trump’s biggest Silicon Valley donors and a funder of hard-right causes. If CBS ends up under an ownership group aligned, even indirectly, with that worldview, the newsroom’s independence is at risk.
But David Ellison isn’t here for CBS News. He’s here for the IP—for “Top Gun,” “Mission: Impossible,” and a streaming foothold. CBS News, to him, is baggage—especially political baggage. If the deal proceeds unchanged, CBS risks becoming an orphan: neither wanted nor protected.
CBS News Is Not Baggage—It’s a Beacon
Before we propose a new path, let’s remember what CBS News is—not just what it was. It isn’t a relic. It’s an award-winning journalistic institution.
“60 Minutes” leads in investigative reporting, from AI regulation to corruption in sports and government. “CBS News Sunday Morning” delivers civic storytelling to one of TV’s most loyal audiences. This isn’t nostalgia. It’s a living newsroom that still punches above its weight and holds power to account.
And the spirit of Cronkite? It’s not a ghost. It’s still present—buried behind an aging broadcast model, but alive in purpose and values. This newsroom still fights to get it right. It still speaks truth to power. It still matters.
Donald Trump’s recent lawsuit against CBS for airing two of Kamala Harris’s quotes side by side may sound absurd, but it’s dangerous. If the Federal Communications Commission or Federal Trade Commission are pressured to intervene on that basis, it should send a chill down the spine of anyone who cares about the First Amendment.
A Different Vision: Trust, Not Transaction
Here’s an alternative: Carve CBS News out. Give it a life of its own.
There’s a growing movement toward nonprofit, civic journalism. ProPublica, The Texas Tribune, and Report for America have proven that donor-backed models can thrive. At the local level, newsrooms like Block Club Chicago have drawn support from foundations like MacArthur.
In 2023 alone, the American Journalism Project committed more than $30 million to civic media startups. And most notably, the Press Forward initiative—a coalition of 20+ major funders—has pledged $500 million over five years to revitalize local journalism across the U.S. It’s the largest philanthropic investment in local news in American history.
But no national television news outlet has made that leap—yet.
A New Model: CBS News as a Trusted Provider
Is it possible? Absolutely. British newspaper The Guardian is protected by the Scott Trust, which guarantees its editorial independence. NPR thrives with a hybrid model of listener support and institutional philanthropy. These are proven frameworks for sustainable, mission-driven journalism.
For CBS News, the roadmap could look like this:
The CBS network keeps its value—local affiliates, NFL contracts, entertainment slate—while the news division becomes a self-sustaining public service. It’s strategic. It relieves a buyer like Ellison of political baggage and offers donors a rare opportunity to preserve truth in the public square.
You Could Lead This Moment
You could be the one to make this happen.
Create a CBS News Trust. Endow it. Appoint a board of public-interest stewards. Shield it from political pressure. Let it modernize for digital—but anchor it in the Cronkite ethos: truth above ratings, service above spin.
If the Ellisons want CBS without the news division, let them have it—but on the condition that the journalism survives with its mission intact.
Others are already taking action. The Soros family stepped in to preserve Spanish-language media from disinformation. Why not protect English-language journalism too?
Legacy Means Doing the Hard Thing
This isn’t nostalgia. It’s practicality. CBS News still holds the public trust. It still draws an audience. But under the wrong ownership, it won’t survive intact.
Your father built this. He didn’t just see CBS as profitable or prestigious. He saw it as essential—to democracy, to public discourse, to truth. He called it the jewel in the crown. He protected it. He believed in it.
Now, you have the chance to protect it forever—not by folding it into a streaming bundle, but by building a future-proof foundation for truth.
If you’re willing to explore how CBS News could become the nation’s first nonprofit video news operation, I’m here to help.
Respectfully,
Steven Rosenbaum
Founder,
Sustainable Media Center
Very well thought out and stated article--this needed to be said. Sadly, and as always in the good ole USA, follow the money. CBS will likely be just another victim of the tragic flaw of capitalism as we do it here, which is all hail the shareholders, and a big "f**k you" to the stakeholders.
Complaining about Larry Ellison backing "right-wing" causes, but then praising the Soros without mentioning they back "left-wing" causes.
Shari Redstone just wants to get the deal with Skydance to the finish line and she doesn't care about what happens to CBS News which they shouldn't cave as I have said many of times.
Well said! CBS is a priceless institution!
…and could evolve into a new role as an online social media news feed and mediation service that helps restore the role of real, human social mediation that has been lost in the platforms.
See the similar example I suggested for the NY Times, to begin with Bluesky’s AT protocol – which could also work for the Guardian. It could even become self-funding, much as the Guardian has. https://ucm.teleshuttle.com/2024/10/making-social-media-more-deeply-social.html