
Carl Mayer
Member since November 2020Contact Carl- VP, Content Strategy & Planning Active International - An AMS Company
- 1 Blue Hill Plaza
- Pearl River New York
- 10965 USA
Articles by Carl All articles by Carl
- Saturday Night's Alright For... Flighting in
Planning & Buying Insider on
12/06/2024
Sports is a great way to reach live viewers, but what if I told you there was another, more cost-efficient way. Allow me to introduce you to Saturday evening.
- Streaming Adopts Cable's Playbook in
Planning & Buying Insider on
06/07/2024
Comments by Carl All comments by Carl
- Streaming Adopts Cable's Playbook
by
Carl Mayer
(Planning & Buying Insider on
06/07/2024)
Thanks for your comment, Ed. You make some great points, and I agree with you that Linear TV is by no means dead. I meant to convey that in the article, and often used “scare quotes” around words like that. When I didn’t, it was because I assumed they were implied. If I was unclear, then that’s on me.Traditional TV has definitely been diminished, and as you mentioned much of that is a function of newer technologies providing more options. Additionally, I would posit that a lot of the wounds have been self-inflicted. Cable networks now save the “good stuff” for their streaming platforms and load their linear schedules with episodes of acquired sitcoms that are already syndicated and infinite blocks of reality programming. Then when the desired audience doesn’t show up, the execs throw up their hands and say, “See? Streaming is killing us!”I also appreciate your point about the targeting of streaming, and that it’s being “better” is “highly theoretical.” I also tend to agree with you here. I think it is undeniable that streaming can be far more specific in its targeting, but that doesn’t necessarily make it better. Let’s say a film studio’s marketing team has decided a film will appeal to Men 18-34. With streaming/CTV ads, they’ll be able to target that audience and virtually exclude all others. But the movie may have also resonated with some other demo(s). In those cases, broader would be “better,” since it would have appealed to an audience that wasn’t even considered. Especially for film releases, where there is a brief window and little time to refine the targeting. So more specific? Yes. Better? Not always.Thanks again for reading and commenting.

About Edit
You haven't told us anything about yourself! Surely you've got something to say. Tell us a little something.