TV and film critics need to respect the rules -- most of the time.
Fox News' Roger Friedman (no relation, as far as I know) knew he was breaking the rules in regard to the new Fox Film
Entertainment movie "X-Men Origins: Wolverine"
when he reviewed a pirated copy of the film,
which won't be released until May.
At first one might say that journalistic intrepidness is a positive mark on one's curriculum vitae. Not so. His bosses fired him because News Corp., as
well as Fox News, has zero tolerance for anyone grabbing what, as it turns out, is their unauthorized content.
The temptation to get out the entertainment news first is strong. But I'd like
to think about those lines we don't cross. Friedman must have known what he was doing.
"I doubt anyone else has seen this film.
But everyone can relax. I am, in fact, amazed about how great "Wolverine" turned
out. It exceeds expectations at every turn," he wrote.
Everyone can relax?
I'm guessing Friedman was identifying News Corp. and Fox senior executives. I'm guessing Friedman
believes journalists -- maybe as part of those rough and tumble guys at Fox News -- should have some leeway. I'm guessing he thinks a positive review would mean a lot.
Snarky critics may
wonder whether there would have been a different reaction were this about a competitor's theatrical film. I'm sure Fox executives would be consistent -- an illegal act is still illegal.
Entertainment journalists looking to flesh out a story on pirated content would have a hard time explaining to their editors the need to do the actual deed -- to be fully engaged in the story.
Friedman's move was all about getting the story first -- with hubris, though it may seem his crime was one that many people perhaps commit.
It's good to know Friedman's firing was an obvious move for a big-time media owner to make -- even in difficult economic times, when losing key on-air talent isn't easy
advertisement
advertisement
.