FTC's Leibowitz Opts For BT Opt-In

Federal Trade Commission Chairman Jon Leibowitz recently warned online ad companies that they didn't have much time left to prove they could protect people's privacy.

Now, he's added that he would like to see marketers get Web users' express consent before tracking them online in order to serve targeted ads. "Opt-out isn't illegal necessarily, but I think the better practice is opt-in," he said this weekend in an interview that aired on C-SPAN.

Leibowitz was speaking about Internet privacy and the importance of obtaining consumers' consent before using their data, when interviewer Grant Gross of IDG interjected that many companies allowed users to opt out of online tracking, but didn't first seek their permission.

"I think some of the more enlightened companies do do opt-in. I think a lot of them don't," Leibowitz responded. "I think the better practice is always opt in."



Now, expressing a preference for opt-in consent is a far cry from mandating it, but behavioral targeting companies still should take note that a top regulator is publicly urging them to move away from an opt-out standard.

The remarks are especially striking because industry groups have generally said repeatedly that companies engaging in "anonymous" tracking and targeting should notify users and let them opt out.

Leibowitz's views notwithstanding, it seems unlikely that behavioral targeting executives will embrace an opt-in standard. Much of that position is driven by the belief that people don't tinker with default settings and, therefore, will not opt in to targeting.

But even if that's currently the case, one reason why people aren't currently changing defaults surely stems from the fact that to do so often requires deciphering long and dense privacy policies. Perhaps people would read policies -- and change their settings -- if the documents were easier to understand. In fact, even without moving to an opt-out standard, notifying users in clear, simple language could probably go a long way towards addressing regulators' concerns.

1 comment about "FTC's Leibowitz Opts For BT Opt-In ".
Check to receive email when comments are posted.
  1. Fran Maier from TRUSTe, May 13, 2009 at 3:30 p.m.

    Wendy - you make a good point, part of the problem is that it there is too much legalese in and outside of the privacy statements and not enough transparency. When consumers start to feel that their data is used outside their reasonable understanding of purpose they get concerned and lose confidence. Look at Adware - dead and gone. Legislators and regulators are rightly responsive to consumer concerns, and can nudge industry in the right direction - hopefully without stifling innovation.
    At TRUSTe we help 1000s of websites deliver clear and more accessible privacy statements that outline data use and give consumers choice for sharing personal information. Our sealholders are increasingly seeking to communicate behavioral and other privacy concerns outside the privacy statement. We are also working with the Future of Privacy Forum to make notice even more understandable and standardized. And we're exploring a range of options to give consumers - through the TRUSTe seal - a way to opt-out easily if that's what they want to do. We hope to continue to work with publishers and advertisers and their industry groups to deliver with what the FTC wants: For consumers to choose how their information is used. Industry has the opportunity, by opting-in to this more transparent approach, to meet the challenge.

Next story loading loading..